Skip to content
Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh Trust Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh Trust Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$353k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$404kArts & Culture$379kFood & Nutrition$320kEducation$198kHousing & Shelter$155kHealth$148kReligion$127kCommunity Improvement$98kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $263k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUYMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$30,000
LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD$30,000
WSU BUSINESS FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ARTIST INCUBATION INC$12,500
PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$10,000
GUYMON PUBLIC LIBRARY & ARTS CENTER$10,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
SALVATION ARMY GUYMAN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
KIDS INC$10,000
GUYMON COMMUNITY THEATRE$10,000
MAIN STREET GUYMON$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 23% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SALVATION ARMY GUYMAN: $15k → 15%WHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INC: $30k → 16%BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%PEACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $15k → 10%MCPHERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%NORTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%SALVATION ARMY GUYMAN: $15k → 15%BRANCHES FAMILY RESOURCES CENTER: $15k → 8%PEACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $15k → 10%WSU BUSINESS FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 16%EMPOWER NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION: $20k → 16%EMPOWER NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION: $20k → 16%GUYMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%NO MAN'S LAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $27k → 13%GUYMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%TEXAS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $78k → 13%TEXAS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 13%DUNAWAY MANOR: $40k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $30k → 13%TEXAS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 13%PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 13%CITY OF GUYMON-NASH SOCCER PROJECT: $25k → 13%THE HERITAGE COMMUNITY: $25k → 13%GUYMON COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT: $25k → 13%ARTIST INCUBATION INC: $25k → 13%PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 13%TEXAS COUNTY YMCA: $20k → 13%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $20k → 13%ARTIST INCUBATION INC: $20k → 13%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $20k → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $18k → 13%OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE PARTNERS: $15k → 13%OAKS OF MAMRE: $15k → 13%PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $15k → 13%OAKS OF MAMRE: $15k → 13%GUYMON COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT: $15k → 13%OAKS OF MAMRE: $15k → 13%ARTIST INCUBATION INC: $15k → 13%OAKS OF MAMRE: $15k → 13%ARTIST INCUBATION INC: $15k → 13%ARTIST INCUBATION INC: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
KS
AR
TN
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 40 repeat orgs$333k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
17

Total granted

$2.2M
$267k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+38%

Still filing today

43%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +12%
  • GS
    Guymon School Educational Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +580% · 36% of their budget
  • MS
    Main Street Guymon Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • BC
    BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -5%
  • WN
    WHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -1%
  • PN
    PANHANDLE NUTRITION SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Okmulgee County Homeless Shelter Inc

To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons

Human Services
2
Sand Springs Community Services Inc

Housing, Food, Clothing and Hygiene products for needy citizens of Sand Springs.

—
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition
5
Texoma Family Shelter

Feed and house homeless families, counsel and help them prepare for job interviews, assist in completing forms for govt assistance, and provide rent/utilities assistance. Coordinate with local food bank.

Human Services
6
Hope House of Scott County

Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families

Human Services
7
Hospitality House of Owatonna Inc

Offer temporary and emergency accommodations for men who are transitioning through homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
Midwest Christian Services % Deanna Scott

Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go

—
9
Habitat for Humanity of Nodaway County Inc

Provide affordable housing to low-income families

Housing & Shelter
10
Food for Homeless

To provide food for the homeless in fort worth tx

—
11
Hospitality House and Nutrition Center Dba Wenatchee Rescue Mission

To provide the needy with lodging, food, shelter and counseling in an effort to help them.

Housing & Shelter
12
Christian Helping Hands of Comanche

Its mission is to share the love of jesus as we provide food, clothing, housing, and hope to the hungry, homeless and hurting

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pheasant Heaven Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hooker Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Texas County Family YMCA Inc: $172,744 · OtherTexas County Family YMCA IncIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $87,500 · OtherGUYMON COMMUNITY THEATRE: $86,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $64,000 · OtherNO MANS LAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $62,074 · OtherKIDS INCORPORATED: $60,000 · OtherPANHANDLE AREA SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC: $58,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $56,000 · OtherPEACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $57,000 · Other+36 more: $712,838 · Other+36 moreLOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $250,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AND F…WHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionWHEATHEART N…ARTIST INCUBATION INC: $147,500 · Arts & CultureTHE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBAKER ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHIGH PLAINS MUSIC FEST INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $125,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPPING STONE SHELTER INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterGuymon School Educational Foundation: $105,000 · EducationBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationPHEASANT HEAVEN CHARITIES INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyNCCF PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyPROJECT HOPE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $8,934 · PhilanthropyMain Street Guymon Inc: $72,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,641,156Food & Nutrition$280,000Arts & Culture$192,500Housing & Shelter$155,000Education$155,000Philanthropy$73,934Community Improvement$72,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD: $250,000 over 9y, 48% of budgetTexas County Family YMCA Inc: $172,744 over 5y, 14% of budgetARTIST INCUBATION INC: $147,500 over 9y, 27% of budgetPANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $125,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetGuymon School Educational Foundation: $105,000 over 9y, 36% of budgetMain Street Guymon Inc: $72,500 over 9y, 11% of budgetKIDS INCORPORATED: $60,000 over 7y, 51% of budgetPANHANDLE AREA SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC: $58,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPEACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $57,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $56,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST DOMESTIC CRISIS SERVICES: $37,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTEPPING STONE SHELTER INC: $30,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetTHE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNCCF PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBAKER ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetYOUTH HORIZONS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHEASANT HEAVEN CHARITIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHIGH PLAINS MUSIC FEST INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $8,934 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVIA CHRISTI FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds Texas County Family YMCA Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTIST INCUBATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Guymon School Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Main Street Guymon Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE AREA SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST DOMESTIC CRISIS SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cherokee Strip Commun…Textron Charitable Tr…Amazonsmile Foundation
Cherokee Strip Community FoundationOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cherokee Strip Community Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh Trust Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh Trust Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Northwest Domestic Crisis Services: 11% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home