· Private foundation
Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh Trust Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of ROBERT C AND MARY E LOLMAUGH TRUST FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD | $30,000 |
| GUYMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| WSU BUSINESS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| ARTIST INCUBATION INC | $12,500 |
| FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| GUYMON PUBLIC LIBRARY & ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY GUYMAN | $10,000 |
| PANHANDLE AREA SHELTERED WORKSHOP | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| MCPHERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MAIN STREET GUYMON | $10,000 |
| GUYMON COMMUNITY THEATRE | $10,000 |
| PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 23% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +12%
- GSGuymon School Educational Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +580% · 36% of their budget
- PAPANHANDLE AREA SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- BCBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -5%
- WNWHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INCone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -1%
- PNPANHANDLE NUTRITION SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons
Housing, Food, Clothing and Hygiene products for needy citizens of Sand Springs.
Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.
Feed and house homeless families, counsel and help them prepare for job interviews, assist in completing forms for govt assistance, and provide rent/utilities assistance. Coordinate with local food bank.
Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families
Offer temporary and emergency accommodations for men who are transitioning through homelessness.
Provide a home and the needs of children with no other place to go
Provide affordable housing to low-income families
To provide food for the homeless in fort worth tx
To provide the needy with lodging, food, shelter and counseling in an effort to help them.
Its mission is to share the love of jesus as we provide food, clothing, housing, and hope to the hungry, homeless and hurting
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pheasant Heaven Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hooker Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 25% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
- Who funds Texas County Family YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds ARTIST INCUBATION INC ↗
- Who funds PANHANDLE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Guymon School Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds Main Street Guymon Inc ↗
- Who funds KIDS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PANHANDLE AREA SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds PEACE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST DOMESTIC CRISIS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cherokee Strip Community Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert C and Mary E Lolmaugh Trust Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northwest Domestic Crisis Services — 11% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.