Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Bollinger Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$367k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$240kFood & Nutrition$170kAnimals$165kRecreation & Sports$110kHuman Services$100kCommunity Improvement$51kCivil Rights$50kReligion$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $217k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA SAN JOSE$112,000
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION$55,000
RUTH ELLIS CENTER$50,000
AL FORNEY CENTER$35,000
HEART OF THE CATSKILLS$25,000
DETROIT DOG RESCUE$25,000
CATSKILL AGRARIAN ALLIANCE$25,000
SHEPHERD WELLNESS COMMUNITY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GRANDVIEW CHURCH PANTRY$5,000
NORTHLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $112k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$865k · 8 repeat orgs$458k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$865k
$281k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+42%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $177k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTH ELLIS CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $160k · revenue +23%
  • CA
    CATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $115k · revenue +26%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • NS
    NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORG
    one grant, 2023 · $51k
  • NL
    NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND NYC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • N
    NSO
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
2
Noah Project

Noah project is a no-kill animal shelter dedicated to the rescue of abused, abandoned and unwanted animals. its mission is to not allow a healthy, adoptable dog or cat that is accepted at the center to be destroyed.

Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
5
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
6
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
7
Animal Welfare Society of Monroe

The animal welfare society of monroe (awsom) provides shelter and medical care for companion animals so they are free from abuse, hunger, fear and lonliness, until placing them in responsible, forever homes.

Animals
8
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
9
Rosie's Southside Animal Shelter Inc

To rescue healthy and treatable dogs and cats at risk of euthanasia, and nurture and restore them to happy and healthy lives in loving homes, reserving euthanasia for those animals that, in a veterinarian's professional opinion, are in a…

Animals
10
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
11
Marshmallow Animal Shelter

The marshmallow animal shelter provides programs and services that aid animals and benefit the animal/human partnership.

Animals
12
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Girls; the most unlike its peers is Casa San Jose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION: $245,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATIONNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORG: $51,237 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND NYC: $50,000 · OtherNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND NYCCATSKILL CENTER: $50,000 · OtherCATSKILL CENTERNSO: $50,000 · OtherNSOCAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH: $40,000 · OtherCAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN PROVINCE OF ST JOSEPHHEART OF THE CATSKILLS: $25,000 · OtherSHEPHERD WELLNESS COMMUNITY OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH: $25,000 · OtherHEART OF THE CATSKILLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $20,000 · OtherCATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC: $115,000 · Food & NutritionCATSKILLS AGRARI…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVES…RUTH ELLIS CENTER: $160,000 · Recreation & SportsRUTH ELLIS CE…Rebel Dogs Detroit Inc: $70,000 · AnimalsRebel Dogs De…DETROIT DOG RESCUE: $60,000 · AnimalsDETROIT DOG R…PAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS UNLIMITE…4 PAWS 1 HEART: $10,000 · Animals4 PAWS 1 HEAR…+2 more: $10,000 · Animals+2 moreCASA SAN JOSE: $112,000 · Human ServicesCASA SAN …ALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Environment
Other$581,237Food & Nutrition$195,000Recreation & Sports$160,000Animals$160,000Human Services$112,000Housing & Shelter$105,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION: $245,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $160,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC: $115,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCASA SAN JOSE: $112,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $85,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRebel Dogs Detroit Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budget4 PAWS 1 HEART: $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF SCHOHARIE VALLEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetROSEMARY FARM SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATSKILLS AGRARIAN ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebel Dogs Detroit Inc ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds PAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS 1 HEART ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF SCHOHARIE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSEMARY FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC12.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Bollinger Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Bollinger Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert Bollinger Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Robert Bollinger Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Bollinger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph