Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Blair Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of Robert Blair Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Robert Blair Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $8k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
6
’18
6
’19
5
’20
6
’21
4
’22
5
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$42kArts & Culture$29kReligion$25kHuman Services$10kHealth$6kAnimals$3kEnvironment$500International$420Other$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$3,500
RICHMOND BALLET$3,500
PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$500
RICHMOND SPCA$250
THE VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$250
COMPACT CANINE RESCUE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500 → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500 → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OH
VA
KS
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 11 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$70k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+90%

Still filing today

55%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RICHMOND BALLET
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +4%
  • TV
    The Virginia Home
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +142%
  • RS
    RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • VM
    VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SM
    SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +244%
  • KJ
    KIDS JOIN THE FIGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +290%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dorchester Paws

Dorchester Paws strives to instill humane principles into society through the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
2
Virginia German Shepherd Rescue Inc

Virginia german shepherd rescue is an all volunteer organization dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation and re-homing of the german shepherd dog (and sometimes other breeds/mixes). the rescue provide a safe haven for german shepherds who…

Animals
3
Richmond Animal Welfare Foundation

Dedicated to providing emergency medical careto our city shelter to helpsave as many lives as possible, and supporting animal lives in the community

Animals
4
Henrico Humane Society Inc

The mission of Henrico Humane Society is to address the enormous population of homeless animals in the greater Richmond, Virginia area by providing care, shelter, and medical services until permanent homes can be found.

Animals
5
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
6
Sfc Virginia

Sfc virginia is a foster-based animal rescue group in fredericksburg, va. founded in june 2019 with a focus on saving dogs and cats from rural and otherwise underserved shelters in the state, we strive to provide quality medical care…

Animals
7
Virginia Beach Spca

The mission of the virginia beach spca is to increase our community's capacity for compassion and decrease the tolerance for cruelty. the virginia beach spca is a non-profit organization supported solely by contributions. we are dedicated…

Animals
8
Adams County Pet Rescue

Rescue, care, and find homes for abandoned and/or abused animals.

Animals
9
Hope for Paws

Hope for paws rescues dogs and all other animals who are suffering on the streets and in shelters. our goal is to educate people on the importance of companion animals in our society, to reduce euthanasia rates at shelters, (continued on…

Animals
10
Rural Dog Rescue

Rural Dog Rescue saves the lives of high risk dogs in economically challenged shelters in rural areas of the country. Our mission is to save the dogs that are at greatest risk of euthanasia and are the most overlooked dogs in the shelter.…

Animals
11
Portsmouth Humane Society Inc

Provide shelter, care, and treatment to homeless animals in the city of portsmouth community through permanent adoptions, spay/neuter programs, and community education.

Animals
12
Albemarle Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

To advance the humane treatment of dogs and cats by providing comprehensive sheltering, medical care, and behavioral support. we strive to ensure every animal has the opportunity to find a permanent, loving home through community education…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $42,184 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCHVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER: $2,500 · OtherVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER+5 more: $2,170 · Other+5 moreTHE RICHMOND BALLET: $28,250 · Arts & CultureTHE RICHMOND BALLET+1 more: $500 · Arts & CulturePETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $9,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,350 · AnimalsA FOREVER-HOME RESCUE FOUNDATION INC: $750 · AnimalsCOMPACT CANINE RESCUE INC: $200 · Animals+1 more: $100 · AnimalsThe Virginia Home: $2,500 · HealthSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentSt Andrew's School: $400 · Education
Community Improvement$42,184Other$29,670Arts & Culture$28,750Human Services$9,100Animals$3,400Health$2,500Environment$500Education$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $42,184 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RICHMOND BALLET: $28,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Virginia Home: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetA FOREVER-HOME RESCUE FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS JOIN THE FIGHT: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPACT CANINE RESCUE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herndon FoundationVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herndon Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Massey Family Foundation · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · The Reinhart Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Blair Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Blair Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert Blair’s filings →

More from the funding graph