Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert B & Addie P Thomson Trust 0000214

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$174kEducation$135kHealth$49kArts & Culture$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kRecreation & Sports$32kCommunity Improvement$16kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,700
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKCS THOMSON TRUST SCHOLARSHIP$8,000
S KORTRIGHT FIRE DEPARTMENT$6,000
SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI$5,700
HOBART ROTARY CLUB$4,500
CATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE$4,000
SKCS DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$4,000
HOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,500
BLOOMVILLE METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
HOBART METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
TOWNSHIP METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
S KORTRIGHT COMMUNITY CHURCH$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $9k → 13%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $8k → 13%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $7k → 13%CATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE: $4k → 10%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $5k → 13%CATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE: $4k → 10%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $5k → 13%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $5k → 13%AO FOX HOSPITAL: $4k → 13%BLOOMVILLE METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 15%BLOOMVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 15%S KORTRIGHT FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 15%S KORTRIGHT FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 15%BLOOMVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 15%BLOOMVILLE METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 15%BLOOMVILLE AMBULANCE SQUAD: $4k → 15%BLOOMVILLE AMBULANCE SQUAD: $4k → 15%BLOOMVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 15%BLOOMVILLE AMBULANCE SQUAD: $4k → 15%S KORTRIGHT FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 15%BLOOMVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 15%DELAWARE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $9k → 15%PINDARS CORNERS FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 15%HOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 15%HOBART METHODIST CHURCH: $8k → 15%HOBART FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 15%VILLAGE OF HOBART: $5k → 15%HOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 15%HOBART ROTARY CLUB: $5k → 15%HOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 15%VILLAGE OF HOBART: $4k → 15%HOBART AMBULANCE SQUAD: $4k → 15%HOBART AMBULANCE SQUAD: $4k → 15%HOBART METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 15%HOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 15%TOWNSHIP METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 15%HOBART AMBULANCE SQUAD: $4k → 15%HOBART FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL: $19k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI: $19k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI: $13k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL: $11k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL: $9k → 15%SKCS THOMSON TRUST SCHOLARSHIP: $8k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI: $6k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI: $5k → 15%SKCS DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $5k → 15%SOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$626k · 45 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
13

Total granted

$626k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-22%

Still filing today

24%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Jefferson Historical Society
    7× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +8%
  • LD
    LITTLE DELAWARE YOUTH ENSEMBLE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +20%
  • WK
    WEST KORTRIGHT CENTREINC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue -22%
  • PC
    PINDARS CORNERS FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware County Historical Society Inc

Historical society

Arts & Culture
2
Kent-Delord House Museum
—
3
Dutchess County Art Association Inc

To foster and perpetuate appreciation of the visual arts

—
4
Preservation Delaware
Arts & Culture
5
Delaware County Cultural Arts Center

To nurture the creative energies of the community via performing and visual art classes and exhibits.

Arts & Culture
6
Downtown Hershey Association

The mission of the dha is to work toward making downtown hershey amazing, to respect and preserve the unique heritage bequeathed by milton s. hershey, and to promote the quality of life for all residents and visitors of derry township.

Community Improvement
7
Johnstown Historical Society
—
8
Delaware County Symphony

Symphonic concerts

Arts & Culture
9
Historical Society of the Town of Middletown Delaware County

The purpose of the Historical Society of the Town of Middletown, Delaware County is to build awareness and appreciation of the heritage of the Town by discovering, preserving and making accessible historical information and materials…

Arts & Culture
10
Dehart Veterinary Foundation
Animals
11
Delaware River Towns Charities

Delaware River Towns Charities exists for the dual purpose of funding the next generation of artists from the Delaware River Valley through educational scholarships to area students pursing post-secondary study in the arts as well as…

Education
12
Andes Society for History & Culture

Research, study, analyze, and present historical information about the town of andes, located in delaware county new york

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Delaware Youth Ensemble Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hatherleigh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AO FOX HOSPITAL: $47,000 · OtherAO FOX HOSPITALSOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DI: $46,245 · OtherSOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOL: $44,892 · OtherSOUTH KORTRIGHT CENTRAL SCHOOLHOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherHOBART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBLOOMVILLE METHODIST CHURCH: $35,500 · OtherBLOOMVILLE METHODIST CHURCHHOBART METHODIST CHURCH: $34,500 · OtherHOBART METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherTOWNSHIP METHODIST CHURCH: $26,500 · OtherSKCS DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $25,500 · OtherS KORTRIGHT FIRE DEPARTMENT: $21,000 · Other+35 more: $166,600 · Other+35 moreLITTLE DELAWARE YOUTH ENSEMBLE INC: $8,300 · Arts & CultureDELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureBRIGHT HILL PRESS INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST NIGHT ONEONTA INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsJefferson Historical Society: $11,000 · EnvironmentDELAWARE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,345 · AnimalsWEST KORTRIGHT CENTREINC: $3,900 · Community ImprovementDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,200 · Community ImprovementAmerican Heart Association Inc: $900 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 · HealthHATHERLEIGH FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$603,737Arts & Culture$14,300Recreation & Sports$14,000Environment$11,000Animals$9,345Community Improvement$6,100Health$1,400Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE: $14,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetJefferson Historical Society: $11,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,345 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLITTLE DELAWARE YOUTH ENSEMBLE INC: $8,300 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetHOBART COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetWEST KORTRIGHT CENTREINC: $3,900 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLAKE DELAWARE BOYS CAMP INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT HILL PRESS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST NIGHT ONEONTA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHATHERLEIGH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATSKILL MOUNTAIN LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Jefferson Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE DELAWARE YOUTH ENSEMBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOBART COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST KORTRIGHT CENTREINC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE DELAWARE BOYS CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation IncNY32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: A Lindsay & Olive B O'Connor Foundation Inc · Delaware National Bank of Delhi Corporate · Robinson-Broadhurst Foundation Inc · George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · The Tianaderrah Foundation (NY) · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert B & Addie P Thomson Trust 0000214 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert B & Addie P Thomson Trust 0000214. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert B & Addie P Thomson Trust 0000214’s filings →

    More from the funding graph