Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Sheril Freedman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$227kEducation$22kInternational$11kAnimals$10kFood & Nutrition$9kHuman Services$9kEnvironment$9kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,145
ST JUDE$647
SPCA$500
EARTH JUSTICE$250
NATIONAL AUDOBON SOCIETY$250
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$250
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 14%ONE VOICE: $1k → 14%ONE VOICE: $1k → 14%ONE VOICE: $1k → 14%FULLFILLMENT FUND: $5k → 14%FULLFILLMENT FUND: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 29 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
25

Total granted

$276k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+38%

Still filing today

55%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $897 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    4× · 2017–2020 · $82k · revenue +49%
  • FF
    FULFILLMENT FUND
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Much Love Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
25/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITALJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE JACK AND JT SNOW SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherST JUDE CHILDENS HOSPITAL: $7,500 · Other+33 more: $54,042 · Other+33 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $82,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DTHE V FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $6,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOODFULFILLMENT FUND: $10,000 · Human ServicesOne Voice: $3,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,250 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE POOR: $4,500 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 · InternationalNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $7,250 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $850 · Environment+2 more: $500 · EnvironmentSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $5,800 · Arts & CultureREMEMBER THE TRIANGLE FIRE COALITION INC: $500 · Arts & CultureUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSANTA MONICA FIRE FIGHTERS RELIEF FUND: $250 · Education
Other$209,042Health$98,000Human Services$14,250International$10,750Environment$9,600Arts & Culture$6,300Education$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $82,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $7,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $5,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOR: $4,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOne Voice: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMuch Love Animal Rescue: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREMEMBER THE TRIANGLE FIRE COALITION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDORIS DAY ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA MONICA FIRE FIGHTERS RELIEF FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds Much Love Animal Rescue ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Sheril Freedman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Sheril Freedman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Sheril Freedman Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Sheril Freedman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Sheril Freedman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph