Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Sara Wolf Charitable Foundation Wsdd Cpas Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$18kPhilanthropy$13kHealth$3kAnimals$650Arts & Culture$260Youth Development$50Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$180
Median grant
7
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE SHORE DRIVE SYNAGOGUE$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,100
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIX$1,000
CONGREGATION BETH TEFILLAH$600
CONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAH$460
HADASSAH$300
CHABAD OF CORONADO$180
ARIZONA GLASS ALLIANCE$150
JIMMY FUND DANA FARBER HOSPITAL$100
PEE WEE'S PET ADOPTION$100
INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION$100
CHILDRENS BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION$100
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF ARIZONA$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
CA
MD
AZ
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$31k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+44%

Still filing today

17%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $980 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIX
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH TEFILLAH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF PHOENIX
    one grant, 2019 · $681
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $600
  • HO
    Hospice of the Valleygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200 · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
2
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
7
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
8
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
9
Infectious Diseases Society of America

The mission of the infectious diseases society of america (idsa) is to improve the health of individuals, communities, and society by promoting excellence in patient care, education, research, public health, and prevention of infectious…

—
10
Anxiety and Depression Association of America

To promote the prevention, treatment, and cure of anxiety, depression, ocd, ptsd, and related disorders and to improve the lives of all people who suffer from them through education, practice, and research.

Health
11
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
12
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIX: $11,900 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIXCONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAH: $7,370 · OtherCONGREGATION SHOMREI TORAHCONGREGATION BETH TEFILLAH: $3,440 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH TEFILLAHLAKE SHORE DRIVE SYNAGOGUE: $2,350 · OtherLAKE SHORE DRIVE SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient: $1,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,100 · Other+14 more: $4,681 · Other+14 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $650 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $450 · AnimalsTWO PUPS WELLNESS FUND: $100 · AnimalsCHABAD OF CORONADO: $180 · ReligionPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $100 · ReligionHospice of the Valley: $200 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $110 · Arts & Culture
Other$32,441Philanthropy$1,000Health$750Animals$550Religion$280Human Services$200Arts & Culture$110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF CORONADO: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWO PUPS WELLNESS FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF CORONADO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TWO PUPS WELLNESS FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Sara Wolf Charitable Foundation Wsdd Cpas Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Sara Wolf Charitable Foundation Wsdd Cpas Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Sara Wolf Charitable Foundation Wsdd Cpas Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Sara Wolf Charitable Foundation Wsdd Cpas Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Sara Wolf Charitable Foundation Wsdd Cpas Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph