Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$581kHealth$345kEducation$229kCommunity Improvement$90kInternational$75kYouth Development$65kPhilanthropy$51kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$66,667
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE$30,000
BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - AMIGOS DE LA CRUZ DE HUANACAXTLE$20,000
BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES PEACE ANIMALS$20,000
NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE$15,000
MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$13,800
CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER$10,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$10,000
EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPUNTA DE MITA FOUNDATION$10,000
OSCARS PLACE ADOPTION CENTER AND SANCTUARY$10,000
BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES-PASITOS DE LUZ$10,000
GROWTH SECTOR COMPANY$10,000
FRIENDS OF FOLSOM ZOO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $67k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $40k → 11%PEACE: $15k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - AMIGOS DE LA CRUZ DE HUANACAXTLE: $20k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%PEACE: $15k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES-PASITOS DE LUZ: $20k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $14k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - AMIGOS DE LA CRUZ DE HUANACAXTLE: $20k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $14k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES PEACE ANIMALS: $20k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $13k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - AMIGOS DE LA CRUZ DE HUANACAXTLE: $20k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $11k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES: $20k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $11k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES PEACE ANIMALS: $16k → 12%MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $11k → 6%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES: $15k → 12%NOR-CAL GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE: $15k → 7%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $30k → 11%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - LA CRUZ FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 12%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES: $15k → 12%BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - LA CRUZ FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +201% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+201%
+38%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthPhilanthropyInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +145%
  • NG
    Norcal Golden Retriever Rescue Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +201%
  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +228%

Funded once

  • AA
    ANIMAL ASSIST AND RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • VS
    VALLARTA SAILING FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
2
Baja Animal Sanctuary

Provide a safe haven for needy animals, reduce population, and adopt homeless animals

Animals
3
Northern California Animal Rescue Friends

We work in cooperation with humane organizations shelters and other groups interested in animal rescue. We rescue domestic animals and place them in nurturing foster homes. All animals are evaluated altered and vaccinated prior to…

Animals
4
Playa Animal Rescue

The organization supports no kill animal shelters in particular Playa Animal House AC in Playa Del Carmen Mexico.

Animals
5
Crossing Guardians

Crossing Guardians is a nonprofit animal rescue and charitable organization. The purpose of our organization is to save and improve the lives of abused, neglected, and homeless animals suffering and struggling to survive along the…

Animals
6
Angelitos Sanctuario Inc

Angelitos Sanctuario rescues dogs, donkeys and other animals in the Central Mexico highlands where we adopt out strong candidates and provide permanent homes for the unadoptable and severely handicapped.

Animals
7
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
8
Amazing Dogs

Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…

Animals
9
Rancho Burro Donkey Sanctuary
Animals
10
Northern California Sled Dog Rescue

Northern California Sled Dog Rescue (NORSLED) is an all volunteer non-profit group dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, fostering and finding new homes for unwanted, abused and abandoned siberian huskies, alaskan malamutes, samoyeds and…

Animals
11
Norcal Boxer Rescue

To provide sanctuary for dogs of the Boxer breed, both full and partial-bred; to educate the public on the importance of spaying or neutering; to provide instruction for proper pet care.

Animals
12
Wonder Dog Rescue

Wonder dog rescue was founded to rescue any animal at risk of euthanasia due to health or behavior issues. we rescue animals throughout northern and central california with a special focus on special needs and hospice animals

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $211,667 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONMEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $111,400 · OtherMEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPUNTA DE MITA FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPUNTA DE MITA FOUNDATIONBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES PEACE ANIMALS: $96,400 · OtherBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES PEACE ANIMALSBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES-PASITOS DE LUZ: $90,000 · OtherBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES-PASITOS DE LUZBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - AMIGOS DE LA CRUZ DE HUANACAXTLE: $60,000 · OtherBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - AMIGOS DE LA CRUZ DE HUANACAXTLEARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $43,000 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATIONBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES - LA CRUZ FOOD PANTRY: $40,000 · Other+2 more: $30,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $280,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOENorcal Golden Retriever Rescue Inc: $135,000 · AnimalsNorcal Golden Retriever Rescue IncOSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SANCTUARY: $40,000 · AnimalsOSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SA…BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC: $50,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · PhilanthropyCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER: $90,000 · HealthPEACE: $30,000 · InternationalMEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $12,850 · EducationGROWTH SECTOR COMPANY: $10,000 · EmploymentVALLARTA SAILING FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$787,467Animals$455,000Philanthropy$95,500Health$90,000International$30,000Education$12,850Employment$10,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE: $280,000 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetNorcal Golden Retriever Rescue Inc: $135,000 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER: $90,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC: $50,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SANCTUARY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $12,850 over 3y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds Norcal Golden Retriever Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds PEACE ↗
  • Who funds MEXICO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GROWTH SECTOR COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds VALLARTA SAILING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert and Patricia Dahl Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Patricia Dahl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph