· Private foundation
Robert & Elizabeth Fergus Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k60 grants · $113k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALFRED BRAUN HUT SYSTEM | $10,000 |
| THEATERWORKS | $10,000 |
| CONSERVATION NORTHWEST | $8,000 |
| RIOS TO RIVERS | $6,125 |
| BEYOND FISTULA | $5,000 |
| WELLESLEY COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| PICKFORD FILM CENTER | $5,000 |
| MULTICULTURAL MUSIC FELLOWSHIP | $5,000 |
| CAF AMERICA (CAMERAS WITHOUT BORDERS) | $3,000 |
| BALLETMET | $3,000 |
| EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE (SACRED LANDS) | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO GRAHAM SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| MIDDLEBURY | $2,500 |
| UNIVERSITY CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $2,500 |
| METHOW CONSERVANCY | $2,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.
100 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CNCONSERVATION NW8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +79%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +79%
- WCWellesley College8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- PAPALO ALTO RECREATION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -4%
- PPROMUSICAone grant, 2022 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
How this is measured
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL MUSIC FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND FISTULA ↗
- Who funds SKAGIT LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds METHOW CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds KULSHAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds North Cascades Institute ↗
- Who funds THE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL FUND ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN BELLINGHAM ASSOCIATION DBA DOWNTOWN BELLINGHAM PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PICKFORD FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · L Brands Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Whatcom Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Columbus Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Palo Alto Rotary Club Annual Charities Inc · Jacob L and Lillian Holtzmann Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Islands Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Robert & Elizabeth Fergus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Elizabeth Fergus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Freedom Reads Inc: 12% of income from government
- Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert & Elizabeth Fergus Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Robert & Elizabeth Fergus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Robert & Elizabeth Fergus’ filings →