Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Debra Peterson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$326kReligion$90kHealth$31kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kArts & Culture$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$10,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$756k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISERICORDIA$28,200
BROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL$10,100
VIOLET FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN CANCER$5,145
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISERICORDIA HOME: $500 → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
NE
MD
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$416k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$416k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+31%

Still filing today

44%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    VIOLET FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN CA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +118%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $21k · revenue +230%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHICAGO COLLEGIATE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +66%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +61%
  • MH
    MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
8
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
9
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Misericordia Home; the most unlike its peers is Paw Paw Lake Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP: $130,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPST IGNATIUS PREP SCHOOL: $120,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS PREP SCHOOLMISERICORDIA: $89,596 · OtherMISERICORDIABROTHER RICE HIGH SCHOOL: $17,650 · Other+9 more: $19,387 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,500 · EducationNORTHERN ILLI…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $20,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES …CHICAGO COLLEGIATE INC: $10,000 · EducationCHICAGO COLLE…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationFOLDS OF HONO…SAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC: $2,610 · EducationVIOLET FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN CA: $21,174 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · Health+3 more: $2,250 · HealthPAW PAW LAKE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $1,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOME: $500 · Human Services
Other$376,633Education$58,610Health$38,424Environment$10,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIOLET FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN CA: $21,174 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COLLEGIATE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC: $2,610 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIOLET FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN CA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COLLEGIATE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAW PAW LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Honor Flight Chicago Corp ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Debra Peterson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Debra Peterson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Debra Peterson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Debra Peterson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Debra Peterson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph