· Public charity
Robert & Blanche Gordon Family Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc
Support the oklahoma city community foundation, inc., by providing grants and funding to designated public charities.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Robert & Blanche Gordon Family Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Robert & Blanche Gordon Family Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $255k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $255,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $369,650 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $114,650 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $248k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER | $25,000 |
| ALL SOULS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $25,000 |
| DZI FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA | $20,000 |
| VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| VAIL SYMPOSIUM | $10,000 |
| WORLD NEIGHBORS | $10,000 |
| REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY | $10,000 |
| ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC | $10,000 |
| VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BETTY FORD ALPINE GARDENS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $85k · revenue +58%
- UWUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $80k · revenue +8%
- WMWALKING MOUNTAINS5× · 2019–2023 · $69k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- VRVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -79%
- KBKATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTERone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +18%
- IHINTEGRIS Health Foundation Incone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
See Disclosure Above.
Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Blue Star Service Dogs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS ↗
- Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Vail Symposium ↗
- Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
- Who funds ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Peyton Family Foundation · The Jada Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Howard Family Charitable Foundation · Vose Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert & Blanche Gordon Family Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Neighbors Inc — 46% of income from government
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert & Blanche Gordon Family Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robert & Blanche Gordon Family Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.