Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Ch

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$239kHealth$102kInternational$58kFood & Nutrition$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kCommunity Improvement$29kEducation$19kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k11 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
LUTHERAN WORLD REFLIEF$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY$5,000
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$4,662
MERCY SHIP$2,000
AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY$1,000
AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION$200
STAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC$27
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW YORK CITY RELIEF: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
AZ
KS
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Ch’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Chlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$591k · 39 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 28 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
34

Total granted

$591k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+66%

Still filing today

44%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JONI AND FRIENDS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $31k · revenue +82%
  • CF
    CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue +136%
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $22k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • L
    LCMS
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • DT
    Dawn Treader School EvangUrban Mingraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +534%
  • AP
    APPALACIAN PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
4
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
5
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
6
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
7
Christian Care Foundation Inc

To support and help expand the ministry of christian care by teaching generous giving, securing philanthropic gifts and administering such gifts with biblical principles.

—
8
Christian Care Management Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

—
9
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
10
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dawn Treader School EvangUrban Min. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH: $105,500 · OtherBETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCHLUTHERAN CHURCH: $68,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCHBETHLEHEM: $39,000 · OtherBETHLEHEMIndividual grant recipient: $34,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJONI AND FRIENDS: $31,000 · OtherJONI AND FRIENDSMERCY SHIP: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · Other+49 more: $193,822 · Other+49 moreFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $29,500 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE PO…CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 · InternationalCRUDEM FOUNDATI…LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $21,500 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD …Mercy Ships International: $9,790 · InternationalMercy Ships Int…FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $9,000 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDR…MAYO CLINIC: $21,392 · HealthALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INC: $18,000 · HealthChristian Health Care Center: $2,000 · Health+2 more: $1,200 · HealthAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $7,000 · ReligionWE RAISE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · ReligionSERVANTS HEART MINISTRY CORPORATION: $1,625 · ReligionCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $6,662 · Human ServicesCITY RELIEF INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentNEW CITY KIDS INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOLID FOUNDATION YOUTH OUTREACH INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$508,222International$93,290Health$42,592Religion$14,625Human Services$8,662Youth Development$8,500Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $29,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $21,392 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN OVERCOMERS INC: $10,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $9,790 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $9,027 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $6,662 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWE RAISE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDawn Treader School EvangUrban Min: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHILOH BIBLE CAMP INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHCC CCRC Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RELIEF INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Health Care Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLID FOUNDATION YOUTH OUTREACH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $1,795 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL THE KINGS HORSES MINISTRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBread For The World Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN OVERCOMERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WE RAISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Dawn Treader School EvangUrban Min ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH BIBLE CAMP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank FoundationNJ23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Hope Foundation · Deeper Life Inc · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Ch funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Ch. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Christian Health Care Center: 0% of income from government
  • Servants Heart Ministry Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Ch’s filings →

More from the funding graph