Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ro Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$222kHealth$171kFood & Nutrition$78kCommunity Improvement$61kCivil Rights$53kCrime & Legal$49kArts & Culture$46kRecreation & Sports$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Green Mountain Horse Association$25,000
Abortion Rights Fund of Western MA$15,000
Bay State Health$15,000
Cooley Dickinson Hospital$15,000
Child Advocacy Center of Hampshire County$10,000
The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts$10,000
Safe Passage Inc$10,000
Treehouse Foundation$10,000
Tapestry Health Systems$8,000
Community Action Pioneer Valley$7,500
Northampton Neighbors$7,500
Behavioral Health Network Inc$6,000
Diffvelopment$5,000
CISA$5,000
The Hampshire County YMCA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc: $2k → 17%Treehouse Foundation: $10k → 12%Treehouse Foundation: $10k → 12%Treehouse Foundation: $10k → 12%Treehouse Foundation: $10k → 12%Lifepath Inc: $5k → 14%Treehouse Foundation: $8k → 12%Lifepath Inc: $5k → 14%Lifepath Inc: $5k → 14%Treehouse Foundation: $4k → 12%Lifepath Inc: $5k → 14%Lifepath Inc: $4k → 14%Lifepath Inc: $3k → 14%Northampton Survival Center: $5k → 12%Northampton Survival Center: $5k → 12%Northampton Survival Center: $5k → 12%Northampton Survival Center: $5k → 12%Northampton Survival Center: $5k → 12%Holyoke Hockey Club: $3k → 12%Northampton Survival Center: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$758k · 32 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
3

Total granted

$758k
$13k

Still filing today

66%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAFE PASSAGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +10%
  • TT
    THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $52k · revenue +160%
  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CY
    Community YMCA of Greenfield
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • N
    NEPM
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TH
    The Hampshire County YMC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
2
North End Community Health Committee

To operate a community health center providing a full range of health care services including medical, dental, vision, mental health and elder services to residents of the north end, charlestown and west end of boston, massachusetts.

Health
3
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.

Health
4
Northeast Human Resources Association Inc

The mission of the northeast human resources association is to lead, advance and influence the management of human resources and its impact on organizational success.

—
5
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
6
Northeast Business Group On Health Inc

Empowering our members to drive excellence and achieve the highest value in healthcare delivery and the consumer experience.

—
7
North Shore Elder Services Inc

The mission of north shorb elder services is to serve the functional needs of older adults residing on the north shore of massachusetts and provide support, information, and service to them and their families.

—
8
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
9
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
10
Health Equity Partnership of North Central Mass Inc

To bring together and support diverse voices to promote health equity in the 27 cities and towns of north central massachusetts.

Community Improvement
11
North Adams Regional Hospital

The mission of north adams regional hospital is to advance health & wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming, inclusive, & personalized environment.

Health
12
Northampton Community Television Inc

To serve as a model community access organization providing programming and educational opportunities to the community through all means technologically available.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northampton Survival Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tapestry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE PASSAGE INC: $60,000 · OtherSAFE PASSAGE INCAbortion Rights Fund of Western MA: $52,500 · OtherAbortion Rights Fund of Western MAMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $50,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $48,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCCOMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY: $37,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEYChild Advocacy Center of Franklin County: $26,000 · OtherChild Advocacy Center of Franklin CountyCISA: $25,000 · OtherCISATAPESTRY INC: $20,000 · OtherThe Hampshire County YMCA: $20,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMPSHIRE COUNTY INC: $22,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMPSHIRE COUNTY INCDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $16,000 · Other+11 more: $44,000 · Other+11 moreTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $51,500 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE FOUND…NORTHAMPTON NEIGHBORS INC: $29,500 · Human ServicesNORTHAMPTON NEIGHBO…NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesNORTHAMPTON SURVIVA…LIFEPATH INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesLIFEPATH INC+2 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesBAYSTATE HEALTH INC: $60,000 · HealthBAYSTATE HEALT…BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $17,000 · HealthBEHAVIORAL HEA…TAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $14,000 · HealthTAPESTRY HEALT…SERVICENET INC: $10,000 · HealthSERVICENET INCTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $40,000 · EducationNorthampton Community Music Center Inc: $12,000 · EducationGREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsJAM CYCLING FUND INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTHAMPTON ARTS COUNCIL INC: $14,500 · Arts & CultureSHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNorthampton Jazz Festival Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureDIFFvelopment: $23,500 · Employment
Other$421,500Human Services$139,000Health$101,000Education$52,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Arts & Culture$34,000Employment$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBAYSTATE HEALTH INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $51,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHAMPTON NEIGHBORS INC: $29,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEPATH INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIFFvelopment: $23,500 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMPSHIRE COUNTY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJAM CYCLING FUND INC: $15,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetNORTHAMPTON ARTS COUNCIL INC: $14,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetTAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorthampton Community Music Center Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICENET INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKESTREL LAND TRUST INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOLYOKE HOCKEY CLUB INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNorthampton Jazz Festival Inc: $3,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCENTER FOR NEW AMERICANS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYSTATE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEPATH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIFFvelopment ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMPSHIRE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TAPESTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JAM CYCLING FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds TAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Northampton Community Music Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICENET INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds KESTREL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLYOKE HOCKEY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Northampton Jazz Festival Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NEW AMERICANS INC ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA43.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Florence Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · United Way of the Franklin & Hampshire Region · The Zoe Foundation · Lennox Foundation · The Mo and Cher Willems Foundation · Health New England Inc · Hurdle Hill Foundation · Peoplesbank Charitable Foundation Inc · The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ro Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ro Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Lifepath Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Servicenet Inc: 82% of income from government
  • Community Action Pioneer Valley: 62% of income from government
  • Tapestry Health Systems Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Safe Passage Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Center for New Americans Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Behavioral Health Network Inc: 28% of income from government
  • The Treehouse Foundation Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Northampton Arts Council Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Shakespeare & Company Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New England Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Baystate Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ro Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ro Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ro Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph