· Private foundation
RJ Miller Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $154k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Grace Christian Academy | $77,000 |
| Mississippi State University Foundation | $77,000 |
| Placer Food Bank | $39,000 |
| Shriner's Children's Northern California | $38,000 |
| Grace Schools | $16,000 |
| Animal Welfare League of Kosciusko County Inc | $10,000 |
| Baker Youth Club | $5,000 |
| Chapman Lake Foundation | $5,000 |
| Fellowship Missions | $3,000 |
| Safe Harbor Child Advocacy Center of Kosciusko Co Inc | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS8× · 2017–2024 · $196k · revenue +73%
- GSGrace Schools8× · 2017–2024 · $181k · revenue +84%
- MSMississippi State University Foundation Inc3× · 2019–2024 · $167k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- NCNORTHSHORE COLLEGE ENHANCEMENT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue +195%
- SFSMH Foundationone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -23%
- CCCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN OF SLIDELL INCone grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
Serve food to families and individuals in need.
To provide food and clothing for the residents in madison, tennessee and surrounding davidson county residents that are in need. we also provide sack lunches to the homeless in the area.
To provide medical care to the uninsured.
A faith based organization operating as a crisis ministry that assists county residents with heat, utilities, shelter, food, and clothing.
Service to low income and homeless
Cch builds and manages quality affordable housing in caring communities.
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
To improve lives by sharing community resources
Provide food for the needy
The school is committed to making disciples who love god completely and who radically impact the lives of others in the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citadel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Warsaw Little League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEEDING THE FOOTHILLS ↗
- Who funds Grace Schools ↗
- Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds KOSCIUSKO COUNTY SHELTER FOR ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BAKER YOUTH CLUB ↗
- Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Lifeline Youth & Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHSHORE COLLEGE ENHANCEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMH Foundation ↗
- Who funds Eureka Schools Foundation ↗
- Who funds AGAITAS INC ↗
- Who funds COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CONCERN OF SLIDELL INC ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL SERVICES INC OF INDIANA ↗
- Who funds World Compassion Network Inc ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds OUR FATHER'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KOSCIUSKO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds WARSAW LITTLE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVER PARKWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF KOSCIUSKO CO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kosciusko County Community Foundation Inc · Zimmer Biomet Foundation Inc · The Dr Dane & Mary Louise Miller Foundation Inc · Kosciusko 21st Century Foundation Inc Aka K21 Health Foundation · Bibler Family Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Terry L and Sandra K Tucker Family Foundation Trust · United Way of Kosciusko County Inc · Hand Family Foundation Inc · Dekko Foundation Inc · Esther Pfleiderer Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Faegre Drinker Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization RJ Miller Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to RJ Miller Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to RJ Miller Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.