Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bibler Family Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$26kHuman Services$21kFood & Nutrition$8kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$8kPublic Benefit$5kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Warsaw Evangelical Presbychurch$1,700
Town of Winona Lake$1,500
Combined Community Services$1,000
Nona Church$1,000
Kosciusko County Council on Aging$1,000
Cardinal Services$1,000
FELLOWSHIP MISSIONS$1,000
Boomerang Backpacks Inc$1,000
Wagon Wheel Center for The Arts$799
Baker Youth Club$700
Individual grant recipient$500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS KOSCIUSKO COUNTY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Casa of Kosciusko County Inc$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Combined Community Services: $1k → 11%Boomerang Backpacks Inc: $1k → 12%Combined Community Services: $900 → 11%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $500 → 11%BOOMERANG BACKPACKS INC: $604 → 12%BOOMERANG BACKPACKS INC: $500 → 12%BOOMERANG BACKPACKS INC: $500 → 12%OUR FATHER'S HOUSE: $2k → 11%OUR FATHER'S HOUSE: $1k → 11%OUR FATHER'S HOUSE: $1k → 11%OUR FATHER'S HOUSE: $1k → 11%OUR FATHER'S HOUSE: $1k → 11%OUR FATHER'S HOUSE: $1k → 11%Our Father's House: $920 → 11%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $900 → 11%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $900 → 11%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $400 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Bibler Family Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Bibler Family Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxxlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$95k · 24 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$95k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+126%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OUR FATHER'S HOUSE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $9k · revenue +25%
  • FM
    FELLOWSHIP MISSIONS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +283%
  • BY
    BAKER YOUTH CLUB
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TU
    TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • SC
    SCHOOL CITY OF WARSAW
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • 2M
    2ND MILE MISSIONS
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Community Kitchen Inc

Our mission is to proclaim the gospel of jesus christ by providing hot meals to those in need and by offering christ-centered ministries to any individual who desires to participate.

Food & Nutrition
2
Congregational Kitchen

The congregational kitchen is committed to demonstrating the love of god through the cheerful serving of free delicious meals in a clean, safe comfortable environment to all who are hungry.

Food & Nutrition
3
Kosciusko County Council On Aging and Aged Inc

To provide services and resources to the aged citizens of kosciusko county indiana and surrounding areas including transportation, mobile meals, and senior activities to improve quality of life

4
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
5
Christ Central School Inc

The mission is to offer a christ centered and quality education to students in eastern ky. the purpose is to provide high standards for intellectual and spiritual learning. the focus is educational excellence in a christian environment for…

6
Cooperstown Food Pantry Inc

The mission of the cooperstown food pantry is to address issues of poverty and hunger in otsego county.

Food & Nutrition
7
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
8
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
9
Indiana Dream Center Inc

To provide a christ centered shelter to meet basic needs of housing, clothing, food, emotional and spirtitual needs.

Housing & Shelter
10
Family First Ministries Inc

Providing emergency food boxes and clothing

Human Services
11
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.

Youth Development
12
Church On Wheels Inc

To serve the homeless and the impoverished population with nourishing meals, warm showers, and a compassionate environment.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baker Youth Club and the most unlike its peers is 2ND Mile Missions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WARSAW COMMUNITY CHURCH INC — $9,671 · OtherWARSAW COMMUNITY CHURCH INCWARSAW EVANGELICAL PRESBYCHURCH — $8,350 · OtherWARSAW EVANGELICAL PRESBYCHURCHWARSAW EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $6,021 · OtherWARSAW EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCARDINAL SERVICES — $5,000 · OtherCARDINAL SERVICESKOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $5,000 · OtherKOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGTOWN OF WINONA LAKE — $4,700 · OtherTOWN OF WINONA LAKEBOOMERANG BACKPACK PROGRAM — $3,115 · OtherKOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL — $3,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS KOSCIUSKO COUNTY — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,100 · Other+11 more — $9,700 · Other+11 moreOUR FATHER'S HOUSE INC — $9,120 · Human ServicesOUR FATHER'S HOUSE…COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES — $4,600 · Human ServicesCOMBINED COMMUNITY…BOOMERANG BACKPACKS INC — $2,604 · Human ServicesBOOMERANG BACKPACK…FELLOWSHIP MISSIONS INC — $8,000 · Housing & ShelterFELLOWSHI…CARDINAL SERVICES INC OF INDIANA — $3,000 · EducationGrace Schools — $1,800 · EducationBAKER YOUTH CLUB — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF KOSCIUSKO COUNTY INC — $3,000 · Civil RightsWAGON WHEEL THEATRE INC — $2,599 · Arts & Culture
Other$59,157Human Services$16,324Housing & Shelter$8,000Education$4,800Youth Development$4,000Civil Rights$3,000Arts & Culture$2,599

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOUR FATHER'S HOUSE INC — $9,120 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP MISSIONS INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES — $4,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAKER YOUTH CLUB — $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF KOSCIUSKO COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCARDINAL SERVICES INC OF INDIANA — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOOMERANG BACKPACKS INC — $2,604 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWAGON WHEEL THEATRE INC — $2,599 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGrace Schools — $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJoe's Kids Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUR FATHER'S HOUSE INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP MISSIONS INC
  • Who funds COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds BAKER YOUTH CLUB
  • Who funds CASA OF KOSCIUSKO COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CARDINAL SERVICES INC OF INDIANA
  • Who funds BOOMERANG BACKPACKS INC
  • Who funds WAGON WHEEL THEATRE INC
  • Who funds Grace Schools
  • Who funds 2ND MILE MISSIONS
  • Who funds Joe's Kids Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kosciusko County Community Foundation IncIN32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kosciusko County Community Foundation Inc · Kosciusko 21st Century Foundation Inc Aka K21 Health Foundation · The Dr Dane & Mary Louise Miller Foundation Inc · Terry L and Sandra K Tucker Family Foundation Trust · Esther Pfleiderer Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Hand Family Foundation Inc · Zimmer Biomet Foundation Inc · RJ Miller Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Kosciusko County Inc · Faegre Drinker Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Lake City Bank Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bibler Family Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph