Skip to content
Riverside Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Riverside Health Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$18MEducation$750kHuman Services$145kInternational$19kReligion$15kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$170,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$170,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $10k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $100k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 11 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$19M
$312k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+83%

Still filing today

82%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    Kansas Health Science University Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $17M · revenue ×879 · 54% of their budget
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $595k · revenue +14%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Clinic Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $435k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • KC
    Kansas City Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +148%
  • MM
    MEDICAL MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL CO SULEMAN SADIQ
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • LG
    Live Greater Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +147%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
2
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

—
4
Guadalupe Health Foundation

To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.

—
5
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
6
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
7
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
8
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
9
Church Health Center of Memphis Inc

The mission is to reclaim the Church's biblical commitment to care for our bodies and spirits. Our ministries provide essential healthcare for the working uninsured and those who would otherwise be unable to afford it.

Health
10
Christ Clinic

Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.

Health
11
University Health Physicians

University health physicians provides quality and compassionate healthcare in an environment of academic excellence.

Health
12
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guadalupe Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Live Greater Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Kansas Health Science University Inc: $16,506,000 · EducationKansas Health Science University Inc+1 more: $250,000 · EducationASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HEALTH INC: $700,000 · HealthASCENSION…MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $595,000 · HealthMENTAL HE…GRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC: $220,000 · HealthGRACEMED …+1 more: $30,000 · HealthGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $435,000 · OtherHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $40,000 · OtherHOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherCAIRN HEALTH INC: $22,200 · Other+6 more: $50,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $125,000 · Human ServicesLive Greater Foundation: $15,000 · ReligionI CARE SAN ANTONIO INC: $4,000 · International
Education$16,756,000Health$1,545,000Other$582,200Human Services$125,000Religion$15,000International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKansas Health Science University Inc: $16,506,000 over 6y, 54% of budgetASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HEALTH INC: $700,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $595,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $435,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetKansas City University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRACEMED HEALTH CLINIC INC: $220,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $125,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCAIRN HEALTH INC: $22,200 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetLive Greater Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetUNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA BETTER CHOICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetI CARE SAN ANTONIO INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Belin FoundationUnited Way of the Pla…Kansas Health Foundat…Dwane L and Velma Lun…Wichita FoundationTextron Charitable Tr…Blue Cross and Blue S…Intrust Bank Charitab…Daniel J Taylor Famil…The Fidelity Bank Fou…Simply Hygiene IncBerry Foundation Inc
Belin FoundationKS22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Belin Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Intrust Bank Charitable Tr · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Simply Hygiene Inc · Berry Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Riverside Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Riverside Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Riverside Health Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Riverside Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Riverside Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home