· Private foundation
River City Loves Kindness Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| POWHATAN FOOD PANTRY | $5,100 |
| THE SPAN (SENIOR CONNECTIONS) | $4,900 |
| THE READ CENTER | $4,900 |
| FREE CLINIC OF POWHATAN | $4,800 |
| RICHMOND SPCA | $4,467 |
| GOOD TIMES SOCIAL | $3,900 |
| HAWTHORNE CANCER FOUNDATION | $3,494 |
| FAMILY LIFELINE | $2,600 |
| VIRGINIA CHARITABLE GAMING ASSOC | $2,500 |
| THE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF | $1,000 |
| MANAKIN EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $1,000 |
| HONORING CHOICES VIRGINIA | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $625 |
| NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CENTER | $540 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFREE CLINIC OF POWHATAN INC4× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +52%
- RAREADING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +17%
- FLFAMILY LIFELINE4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- RCRIVER CITY LOVES KINDNESS INCone grant, 2024 · $16k
- VMVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTERone grant, 2022 · $5k
- CCCircle Center Adult Day Servicesone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide a structured, supportive, supervised and enrichment environment for the elderly at a low cost to the participants and their families.
We improve health every day through coordinating, promoting and planning for the provision of health services and the promotion of health, medical education, and the social, cultural, educational, and economic development of the community.
Central virginia health services, inc. (organization) is a non-profit health care organization with locations in bowling green, charles city, new canton, charlotte court house, farmville, alberta, petersburg, aylett, hopewell, montross,…
As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.
The adult care center of roaonke valley is a safe and secure program committed to providing compassionate, stimulating daytime care for dependent adults while providing family support and an alternative to long-term care.
See schedule o.as part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day through the establishment and operation of programs and services for the provision of health care and for health related purposes; the…
The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.
The mission of northern virginia family service (nvfs) is "to empower individuals and families to improve their quality of life, and to promote community cooperation and support in responding to family needs." nvfs was established in 1924…
Uva prince william health system ("pwhs") is part of the uva community health enterprise, an integrated network of not-for-profit, tax-exempt entities that includes physician offices, outpatient facilities and community medical centers.…
Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.
To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.
As part of sentara health's integrated delivery system, we improve health every day.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Honoring Choices Virginia Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Life Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF POWHATAN INC ↗
- Who funds READING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds FAMILY LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds HAWTHORNE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHESTERFIELD FOOD BANK OUTREACH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HONORING CHOICES VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Circle Center Adult Day Services ↗
- Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Annabella R Jenkins Foundation · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization River City Loves Kindness Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.