Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rita J Garth Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$157kHealth$130kReligion$80kFood & Nutrition$20kEducation$11kCrime & Legal$8kYouth Development$7kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$914k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMESIVTA$25,000
EZRAT ISRAEL INC$15,000
CHABAD OF BUSHWICK$15,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SAFEHORIZON: $3k → 17%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $5k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $4k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
IA
NJ
CA
MD
NM
TN
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$226k · 13 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
38

Total granted

$226k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+20%

Still filing today

31%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    National Stuttering Association
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +91%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +120%
  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    3× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH CENTER OF MAUI
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • CF
    COALITION FOR HISPANIC FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +79%
  • MI
    MACHNE ISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
5
Mjhs Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

To provide hospice services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis

Human Services
6
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
7
Healthcare Choices Ny Inc

Healthcare choices ny, inc., a federally qualified health center licensed by the state of new york is an outpatient health center providing community based health services primarily to persons who may have a mental health diagnosis or be…

Health
8
Ronald McDonald House Charities New York Metro Inc

Our Mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

9
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

10
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
11
Kings Physician Services Pc

To provide excellent medical health care services to patients without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disabilities.

Health
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America and the most unlike its peers is The Auxiliary of Kings County Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Educational & Charit…Social Change InfrastructureFood Pantry & Meal ProgramsHouston Community Foundatio…Disability & Mental Health …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr15%13%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr22%29%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr9%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%19%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr22%27%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr9%18%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
11%
4,192/37,806

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOYS FOR HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN — $28,500 · OtherTOYS FOR HOSPITALIZED CHILDRENRUDERMAN INCLUSION INITIATIVE — $26,500 · OtherRUDERMAN INCLUSION INITIATIVEIndividual grant recipient — $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CALIFORNIA — $26,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CALIFORNIAHAMESIVTA — $25,000 · OtherHAMESIVTAEZRAT ISRAEL INC — $17,000 · OtherEZRAT ISRAEL INCCHABAD OF BUSHWICK INC — $15,000 · OtherMACHNE ISRAEL-RUDERMAN INCLUSION IN — $12,500 · OtherVALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $12,000 · Other+30 more — $130,000 · Other+30 moreNational Stuttering Association — $28,000 · HealthNational Stutteri…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITAL…The Auxiliary Of Kings County Hospital — $5,000 · HealthThe Auxiliary Of …Texas Children's Hospital — $5,000 · HealthTexas Children's …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC — $4,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD H…PROJECT SUNSHINE INC — $3,500 · HealthCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $11,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $3,500 · Food & NutritionKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah — $11,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesChevra Hatzalah of Crown Heights Corp — $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE — $5,000 · International
Other$318,500Health$66,000Food & Nutrition$14,500Human Services$14,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNational Stuttering Association — $28,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah — $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR HISPANIC FAMILY SERVICES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChevra Hatzalah of Crown Heights Corp — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL AUTISM PROJECT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEEDS IN THE MIDDLE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITS GOOD TO KNOW — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSky Mountain Wild Horse Sanctuary — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Stuttering Association
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds Keren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah
  • Who funds COALITION FOR HISPANIC FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds Chevra Hatzalah of Crown Heights Corp
  • Who funds The Auxiliary Of Kings County Hospital
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND
  • Who funds PROJECT SUNSHINE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rita J Garth Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rita J Garth Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rita J Garth Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph