Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rita & Luis Echenique Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$86k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

57% of Rita & Luis Echenique Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Inland Empire Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
4
’18
1
’19
1
’20
2
’21
3
’22
5
’23
9
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$757kEducation$98kArts & Culture$84kRecreation & Sports$80kFood & Nutrition$66kHousing & Shelter$25kHealth$25kYouth Development$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $86k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 97% of reported assets are held in Hilltop Securities.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$86,000
SALINAS SOCCER FEMENIL$10,000
AVILA VICTORY BOXING INC$7,500
MONTEREY COUNTY DANCE FOUNDATION$7,500
KING CITY BOXING CLUB$6,000
CHISPA$5,000
HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION$5,000
STAGE HANDS$5,000
THE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF KING C$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PET PROJECT$3,000
DIA DE LOS MUERTOS PARADE$2,500
RANCHO CIELO YOUTH CAMPUS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%SUN STREET CENTERS: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370k · 19 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$370k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+12%

Still filing today

26%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONTEREY COUNTY RURAL AG MUSEUM
    5× · 2017–2023 · $55k
  • AV
    AVILA Victory Boxing Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k
  • KC
    KING CITY BOXING CLUB
    5× · 2019–2025 · $27k

Funded once

  • SV
    Salinas Valley Fair Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +75%
  • MM
    MEE MEMORIAL SERVICE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • CF
    CAMPAIGN FOR MISSION SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monterey County Interfaith Alliance
—
2
Monterey Bay United
Recreation & Sports
3
Salinas Steinbeck Rotary Club

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

—
4
Salinas Police Foundation

To provide community programs which support law enforcement and crime prevention needs for the community of SalinasTo provide training and equipment for the Police Department of the City of Salinas, California.

Crime & Legal
5
Communities for Sustainable Monterey County

Recruiting and training volunteers that implement changes in the cities of Monterey County that include the establishment and operation of Community Gardens; the planting of tees on urban street; teaching citizens how to reduce the amount…

Environment
6
Casa Abrego Preservation Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Monterey Bay Dart

Drone, Aviation, and Robotics Technology (DART) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) to support quality job growth and community vitality. DART's mission is to…

Science & Tech
8
Monterey Fire Safe Council Inc

To provide education, implement and fund projects in accordance with National and California Fire Plans, mobilize citizens and agencies to reduce losses from wildfires, exchange information and foster fire prevention and fire safety within…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Monterey Collegiate Foundation co Katy Reyes

We provide grants to charities for activities such as youth sports, youth programs and youth education for the residents of Monterey County, California.

Philanthropy
10
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
11
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
12
Santa Maria Fairpark Foundation Inc

The mission of Santa Maria Fairpark Foundation, Inc., is to preserve and enrich the heritage of the 37th District of Agriculture Association - Santa Maria Fairpark - and showcase agricultural industries to the community. We offer support…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monterey County Dance Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Our Neighborhood Pet Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Inland Empire Community Foundation: $840,500 · PhilanthropyInland Empire Community Foundation+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyMONTEREY COUNTY RURAL AG MUSEUM: $55,000 · OtherMONTEREY COUNTY RURAL AG MUSEUMKING CITY BOXING CLUB: $27,000 · OtherKING CITY BOXING CLUBSAN ARDO UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $25,500 · OtherSAN ARDO UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOLMONTEREY COUNTY DANCE FOUNDATION: $24,500 · OtherMONTEREY COUNTY DANCE FOUNDATIONMEE MEMORIAL SERVICE LEAGUE: $20,000 · OtherSALINAS SOCCER FEMENIL: $20,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF KING C: $20,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $17,500 · OtherDIA DE LOS MUERTOS PARADE: $17,500 · OtherSAN LUCAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $17,195 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+18 more: $152,780 · Other+18 moreAVILA Victory Boxing Inc: $39,900 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentSalinas Valley Fair Inc: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFOUNDATION FOR MO COUNTY FREE LIBRARIES: $10,000 · EducationKING CITY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT SYSTEMS & PLANNING ASSOCIATION: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesSUN STREET CENTERS: $7,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$843,000Other$411,975Youth Development$42,400Recreation & Sports$20,000Education$20,000Housing & Shelter$17,500Human Services$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $840,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetAVILA Victory Boxing Inc: $39,900 over 4y, 16% of budgetMONTEREY COUNTY DANCE FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetSalinas Valley Fair Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT SYSTEMS & PLANNING ASSOCIATION: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOur Neighborhood Pet Project: $11,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR MO COUNTY FREE LIBRARIES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKING CITY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetFIRST NIGHT MONTEREY: $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSUN STREET CENTERS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AVILA Victory Boxing Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY COUNTY DANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Salinas Valley Fair Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT SYSTEMS & PLANNING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Our Neighborhood Pet Project ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR MO COUNTY FREE LIBRARIES ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KING CITY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NIGHT MONTEREY ↗
  • Who funds SUN STREET CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rita & Luis Echenique Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rita & Luis Echenique Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rita & Luis Echenique Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rita & Luis Echenique Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rita & Luis Echenique’s filings →

    More from the funding graph