Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ringwald Eberle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$456k
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$1.0MEducation$620kHuman Services$287kFood & Nutrition$213kHealth$131kSocial Science$80kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kPublic Benefit$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $121k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $336k
$3,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN VIANNEY HIGH SCHOOL$37,000
MATER DEI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$31,500
COR JESU ACADEMY$26,500
ASSUMPTION PARISH$25,000
KENRICK GLENNON SEMINARY$25,000
FOCUS MISSION FOUNDATION$22,000
ST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL$21,500
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL (ST LOUIS)$20,000
CARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS$15,000
SISTERS OF SAINT JOSEPH OF CARONDELET$15,000
CARDINAL GLENNON FOUNDATION$15,000
NAZARETH LIVING CENTER$15,000
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$12,000
VITAE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $15k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $10k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $10k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $6k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $5k → 21%FEED MY PEOPLE: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $5k → 21%FEED MY PEOPLE: $10k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $10k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $10k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $10k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $8k → 11%SOUTH COUNTY PREGNANCY HEALTH CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 64 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

64 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
3

Total granted

$2.3M
$21k

Still filing today

28%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NAZARETH LIVING CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +25%
  • CG
    CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +28%
  • OF
    OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL - ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JAMES THE GREATER CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • DO
    DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS - CHAPLAIN SERVICE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
2
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

3
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
4
Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri Inc

A faith-based organization providing compassionaite, quality social services to the vulnerable.

Human Services
5
St Patrick Center

St. patrick center transforms lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

6
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

7
Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri

Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services
8
Saint Louis Counseling Inc

The mission of saint louis counseling is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. the purpose of saint louis counseling is "guided by the teachings of jesus christ, saint…

9
St Patrick Apartments Inc

Inspired by jesus christ, st patrick apartments, inc. assists cardinal ritter senior services in providing compassionate care through a continuum of high quality residential healthcare and supportive social services. we bring the mission…

10
Catholic Social Services

To perform the works of mercy in response to the call of god. our corporal works of mercy performed primarily include providing food, clothing, shelter, and prison ministry. our spiritual works of mercy performed primarily include…

11
Catholic Charities of Louisville Inc

Catholic charities of louisville serves people in need, especially the poor and oppressed. consistent with the principles of catholic social teaching, we build bridges of hope, mercy, and justice as we accompany struggling families and…

Human Services
12
Child Center-Marygrove

Providing a safe home, compassionate care and high-quality mental health services to children and youth who have experienced significant trauma, to restore their childhood and equip them to productive adulthood.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cardinal Ritter Senior Services and the most unlike its peers is Valle Schools Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%6%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%9%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr24%59%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr15%5%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr24%72%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,456

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VIANNEY HIGH SCHOOL — $264,500 · OtherVIANNEY HIGH SCHOOLCOR JESU ACADEMY — $210,500 · OtherCOR JESU ACADEMYST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $194,000 · OtherST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVITAE FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherSISTERS OF SAINT JOSEPH — $70,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Other+58 more — $974,995 · Other+58 moreCARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES — $90,000 · HealthCARDINAL …NAZARETH LIVING CENTER — $90,000 · HealthNAZARETH …QUEEN OF PEACE CENTER — $12,000 · HealthQUEEN OF …RELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTER — $10,000 · HealthFEED MY PEOPLE — $58,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS — $50,650 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $58,000 · Food & NutritionCaritas Connections Inc — $30,500 · Food & NutritionST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $34,500 · EducationVALLE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $13,500 · Education
Other$1,988,995Health$202,000Human Services$110,650Food & Nutrition$88,500Education$63,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES — $90,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetNAZARETH LIVING CENTER — $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $58,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE — $58,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS — $50,650 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC — $46,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $34,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas Connections Inc — $30,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $21,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN — $15,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVALLE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES — $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN OF PEACE CENTER — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRELEVANT PREGNANCY OPTIONS CENTER — $10,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY PREGNANCY HELP CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES
  • Who funds NAZARETH LIVING CENTER
  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC
  • Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Caritas Connections Inc
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO26.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Vatterott Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Canda Charitable Trust · Catholic Charities Foundation · Ring Vp Sr Charitable Foundation · Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis · Ravarino Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ringwald Eberle Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ringwald Eberle Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ringwald Eberle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph