Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence.

$889k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$453k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $552,527 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $888,640 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $336,113 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $453k
$452,527
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES$452,527
CHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LINKSTL: $13k → 21%LINKSTL: $8k → 21%LINKSTL: $5k → 21%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $30k → 21%MARY QUEEN AND MOTHER ASSOCIATION: $21k → 11%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $20k → 21%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $19k → 21%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $13k → 21%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $10k → 21%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 90% of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 10% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louislessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 15 repeat orgs$767k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$12M
$767k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+21%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.2M · revenue +80% · 53% of their budget
  • SP
    ST PATRICK CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +26%
  • QO
    QUEEN OF PEACE CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $408k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • RP
    RURAL PARISH CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $423k · revenue -26%
  • MO
    MOTHER OF PERPETUAL HELP RESIDENCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +35%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Patrick Apartments Inc

Inspired by jesus christ, st patrick apartments, inc. assists cardinal ritter senior services in providing compassionate care through a continuum of high quality residential healthcare and supportive social services. we bring the mission…

2
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

3
Holy Angels Apartments Inc

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence.

4
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services
5
Cardinal Ritter Institute Residential Services Corp

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence.

Human Services
6
Our Lady of Life Apartments

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence.

Human Services
7
Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri Inc

A faith-based organization providing compassionaite, quality social services to the vulnerable.

Human Services
8
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

9
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
10
Dismas House of St Louis
Crime & Legal
11
Catholic Charities of Southwest Louisiana in the Roman Catholic Diocese

The mission of catholic charities of southwest louisiana is to be christ's merciful love to those who suffer.our mission is to be carried out by catholic people and others in fraternal goodwill pooling their resources to reach out and…

Human Services
12
Catholic Charities of Louisville Inc

Catholic charities of louisville serves people in need, especially the poor and oppressed. consistent with the principles of catholic social teaching, we build bridges of hope, mercy, and justice as we accompany struggling families and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mother of Perpetual Help Residence Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Red Circle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%4%5–10yr17%15%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr17%12%35–55yr19%54%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%1%10–20yr16%0%20–35yr17%0%35–55yr19%99%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
14%
1,452/10,127

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES — $7,178,538 · OtherST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICESST PATRICK CENTER — $1,058,329 · OtherST PATRICK CENTERCARDINAL CARBERRY SENIOR LIVING CENTER — $733,250 · OtherCARDINAL CARBERRY SENIOR LIVING CENTERRURAL PARISH CLINIC — $423,221 · Other+15 more — $768,508 · Other+15 moreCHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE — $1,462,311 · HealthCHILD CENTER-MARYGR…QUEEN OF PEACE CENTER — $407,843 · HealthQUEEN OF PEACE CENT…CARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES — $259,200 · HealthCARDINAL RITTER SEN…ST MARTHA'S HALL — $96,500 · Human ServicesLINKSTL INC — $26,212 · Human ServicesMARY QUEEN AND MOTHER ASSOCIATION — $21,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri — $10,000 · Human ServicesMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP — $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentA RED CIRCLE — $10,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE — $9,000 · EducationBEYOND HOUSING INC — $9,813 · Housing & ShelterMissourians to Abolish the Death Penalty — $9,000 · Civil Rights
Other$10,161,846Health$2,129,354Human Services$153,712Youth Development$19,500Education$19,000Housing & Shelter$9,813Civil Rights$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES — $7,178,538 over 9y, 53% of budgetCHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE — $1,462,311 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER — $1,058,329 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCARDINAL CARBERRY SENIOR LIVING CENTER — $733,250 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetRURAL PARISH CLINIC — $423,221 over 1y, 14% of budgetQUEEN OF PEACE CENTER — $407,843 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCARDINAL RITTER SENIOR SERVICES — $259,200 over 2y, 32% of budgetSAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INC — $236,700 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMOTHER OF PERPETUAL HELP RESIDENCE INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $175,250 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetST MARTHA'S HALL — $96,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetLINKSTL INC — $26,212 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES FOUNDATION — $22,103 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARY QUEEN AND MOTHER ASSOCIATION — $21,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSt Louis Inter Faith Committee on Latin America — $19,500 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetA RED CIRCLE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC — $9,813 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMissourians to Abolish the Death Penalty — $9,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE — $9,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCITY GREENS MARKET INC — $6,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO26.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Catholic Charities Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · East Missouri Foundation · Vatterott Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Jefferson Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · St Louis Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph