Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ravarino Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$592k
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$236k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.4MReligion$889kHuman Services$229kRecreation & Sports$133kHealth$98kPhilanthropy$95kArts & Culture$27kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $286k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOTRE DAME UNIVERSITY$236,000
ST JOSEPH CHURCH$50,250
Individual grant recipient$43,000
AQUINAS INSTITUTE$37,500
ORLANDO FAMILY FOUNDATION$23,500
AUGUTINE INSTITUTE$21,000
DELTA GAMMA CENTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
KENRICK GLENNON SEMINARY$16,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERV$16,000
FATHERS AND FAMILIES SUPPORT$11,000
DAUGHTERS OF ST PAUL$10,500
PAPAL FOUNDATION$10,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS$8,500
TODAY AND TOMORROW EDUCATIONAL FOUND$8,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALIVE: $250 → 9%FOCUS MARINES FOUNDATION: $250 → 5%OUR LADY'S INN: $2k → 11%LITTLE BITS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%LITTLE BITS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $500 → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $500 → 11%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $500 → 11%OUR LADY'S INN: $750 → 21%OUR LADY'S INN: $250 → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $4k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $3k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $3k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $2k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CO
MO
KY
VA
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 62 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
53

Total granted

$1.8M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+16%

Still filing today

40%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $113k · revenue +98%
  • Augustine Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +148%
  • DG
    Delta Gamma Center for Children with Vis
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • LP
    LA PIAZZA IMO ON THE HILL - ST AMROSE CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS
    one grant, 2020 · $29k
  • IO
    ITALION OPEN CHARITY EVENT
    one grant, 2021 · $28k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
2
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
3
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
4
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services
7
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

8
Dismas House of St Louis
Crime & Legal
9
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
10
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

11
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
12
Saint Louis Counseling Inc

The mission of saint louis counseling is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. the purpose of saint louis counseling is "guided by the teachings of jesus christ, saint…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Center-Marygrove and the most unlike its peers is Wear&Give. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#20#8#13#12#0#21#1#19#18#14
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%6%5–10yr16%13%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr24%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr15%6%20–35yr16%70%35–55yr24%23%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,431

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
29/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DAUGHTERS OF ST PAUL — $268,900 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF ST PAULST JOSEPH CHURCH — $122,750 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $112,500 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICESKENRICK GLENNON SEMINARY — $111,500 · OtherKENRICK GLENNON SEMINARYITALIAN OPEN CHARITY EVENT — $104,000 · OtherITALIAN OPEN CHARITY EVENTORLANDO FAMILY FOUNDATION — $83,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $75,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $72,250 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE PILLAR — $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $61,500 · Other+99 more — $644,850 · Other+99 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $1,272,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacAugustine Institute Inc — $60,200 · Education+7 more — $53,250 · EducationDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis — $60,000 · HealthCHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE — $5,500 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthPEDAL THE CAUSE — $11,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADYS INN — $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Human ServicesFEED MY PEOPLE — $1,000 · Human Services+3 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $15,156 · Arts & CultureCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalClare's House — $5,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $1,000 · AnimalsSAINT LOUIS SENIOR DOG PROJECT — $250 · Animals
Other$1,790,250Education$1,385,450Health$65,750Human Services$17,000Arts & Culture$15,156International$15,000Animals$6,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $1,272,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $112,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc — $60,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis — $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFONTBONNE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $18,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $15,156 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLollys Place Inc — $7,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetClare's House — $5,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FOR LIFE — $5,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMATER MEDIA — $5,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetINCARNATE WORD ACADEMY — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUO DOGS INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LADYS INN — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's University — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE CLASSROOM — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Louis World Food Day Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWear&Give — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetU City in Bloom — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas Connections Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS MARINES FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc
  • Who funds Delta Gamma Center for Children with Vis
  • Who funds FONTBONNE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS
  • Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO42.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Boniface Foundation · Pott Foundation · Jefferson Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ravarino Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ravarino Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ravarino Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 135 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph