Skip to content
Rimer Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Rimer Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$221kEducation$133kReligion$73kPhilanthropy$18kHuman Services$10kCommunity Improvement$4kYouth Development$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND CL MARTIN MEM FOUNDTN$10,000
THE PINE SCHOOL$1,246
SAFESPACE$250
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATIO$250
COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN CO$250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$200
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$200
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$100
SALVATION ARMY$100
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%ARC OF MARTIN COUNTY: $500 → 10%SAFESPACE: $300 → 10%SAFESPACE: $250 → 10%SAFESPACE: $250 → 10%SAFESPACE: $250 → 10%SAFESPACE: $250 → 10%SAFESPACE: $200 → 10%SAFESPACE: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
CT
CO
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 35 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
6

Total granted

$395k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+53%

Still filing today

40%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $32k · revenue +51%
  • TP
    The Pine School Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $21k · revenue +96%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • SH
    SALEM HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • LF
    LIBRARY FNTN OF MARTIN CO
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FED OF PALM BEACH: $35,000 · OtherJEWISH FED OF PALM BEACHCLEVELAND CL MARTIN MEM FOUNDTN: $30,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CL MARTIN MEM FOUNDTNN SHORE JEWISH COMM CTR: $25,750 · OtherN SHORE JEWISH COMM CTRUNITED WAY OF MARTIN CO: $17,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MARTIN COTEMPLE BEIT HA YAM INC: $11,000 · Other+22 more: $38,250 · Other+22 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $70,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERS…GOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY: $32,469 · EducationGOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVE…The Pine School Inc: $21,246 · EducationThe Pine School IncTRINITY COLLEGE: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $105,000 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDAT…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $9,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute…+2 more: $2,850 · HealthLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesARC OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesSAFESPACE INC: $1,700 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $1,050 · Recreation & SportsCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $400 · Public Benefit
Other$207,500Education$132,215Health$116,850Human Services$8,700Recreation & Sports$1,050Public Benefit$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY: $32,469 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pine School Inc: $21,246 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetARC OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAFESPACE INC: $1,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,650 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTILTON SCHOOL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $1,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds GOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds The Pine School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFESPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TILTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Mariner Sands Charity…Loblolly Community Fo…Gordana Uscumlic Foun…Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie IncFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · Mariner Sands Charity Week Inc · Loblolly Community Foundation Inc · Gordana Uscumlic Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rimer Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rimer Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Safespace Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Governor Dummer Academy the Governor's Academy: 1% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • The Pine School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rimer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home