Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rik and Peg Master Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$9kArts & Culture$6kReligion$3kCivil Rights$2kEducation$1kPhilanthropy$108Science & Tech$108Health$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$259
Median grant
4
States reached
$129k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$9,100
Pioneer Center$2,798
WTTW$2,008
St Mary Church$1,057
Indian Country Media LLC$500
McHenry County Historical Society$500
AIA Chicago Foundation$259
AIA Illinois Foundation$206
National Congress of American Indians Funds$111
7 Gen Found (SGF)$108
Architects Foundation$103
CFNF (Center for Native Futures)$100
Veterans Path to Hope$41
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women USA: $200 → 8%National Congress of Amerian Indian: $111 → 14%Pioneer Center: $3k → 6%AIA Illinios Foundation: $206 → 11%CFNF (Center for Native Futures): $100 → 14%Rockford Illustrating: $9k → 15%Native Hope: $1k → 15%National Congress of American Indians Funds: $111 → 14%Pioneer Center: $3k → 6%AIA Illinois Foundation: $206 → 11%CFNF Center for Native Futures: $100 → 14%Architects Foundation: $500 → 14%Pioneer Center: $2k → 6%AIA Illinois Foundation: $200 → 11%WTTW: $2k → 14%Architects Foundation: $103 → 14%Pioneer Center: $2k → 6%WTTW: $1k → 14%Architects Foundation: $103 → 14%St Mary Church: $1k → 6%WTTW: $800 → 14%St Mary Church: $1k → 6%AIA Chicago Foundation: $259 → 14%St Mary Church: $600 → 6%AIA Chicago Foundation: $259 → 14%St Mary Catholic Church: $500 → 6%AIA Foundation Chicago: $100 → 14%JEPF: $260 → 6%JEPF: $105 → 6%Veterans Path to Hope: $41 → 6%McHenry County Historical Society: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 8 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$18k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-14%

Still filing today

63%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +29%
  • AF
    AIA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $706 · revenue +18%
  • AC
    AIA CHICAGO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $518 · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • NH
    NATIVE HOPE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -14%
  • SM
    ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A I a Illinois

Empowered by members to champion the profession of architecture.

—
2
Aia Indiana Inc

The indiana chapter of the american institute of architects [aia indiana] is a non-profit professional association representing the interests of and providing services to nearly 900 architects and affiliated design professionals.the…

—
3
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
4
American Institute of Architects Los Angeles Chapter

Providing leadership in improving the building environment

—
5
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
6
Third Coast International Audio Festival

To cultivate a growing international culture of listening.

Arts & Culture
7
Aia Chicago

The purpose of this organization is to provide education and support to architects within the territory of the chicago chapter.

—
8
Community Foundation of Northern Il

The Community Foundation of Northern Illinois ("CFNIL") was established to serve as a catalyst for giving and a promoter of philanthropy. The Foundation attracts, preserves, and grows a charitable endowment for the present and future needs…

Philanthropy
9
Native Americans in Philanthropy

Native Americans in Philanthropy advocates, educates, convenes and innovates to dramatically increase philanthropic investments in Native communities and transform the philanthropic sector's relationship with Indigenous communities.

Civil Rights
10
Chicago Cultural Alliance

The Chicago Cultural Alliances mission is to connect, promote, and support centers of cultural heritage for a more inclusive Chicago. We are an active consortium of 50 cultural heritage museums, centers, and historical societies that…

Arts & Culture
11
Advance Illinois Nfp

Advance illinois was founded in 2008 as an independent policy and advocacy organization that works toward a heathy public education system that prepares students to achieve success in college, career, and civic life. advance illinois is…

Education
12
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Transitional Living Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $9,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPioneer Center: $8,917 · OtherPioneer CenterST MARYS CHURCH: $2,682 · OtherST MARYS CHURCHNATIVE HOPE INC: $1,040 · Other+11 more: $3,221 · Other+11 moreWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $3,808 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORL…AIA ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $612 · Arts & CultureAIA ILLINOIS FOUND…MCHENRY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 · Arts & CultureMCHENRY COUNTY HIS…+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureAIA FOUNDATION: $706 · EducationTransitional Living Services Inc: $41 · Housing & Shelter
Other$24,960Arts & Culture$5,020Education$706Housing & Shelter$41

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $3,808 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE HOPE INC: $1,040 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIA FOUNDATION: $706 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAIA ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $612 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetAIA CHICAGO FOUNDATION: $518 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMCHENRY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS FUND: $222 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Native Futures: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds AIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AIA ILLINOIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AIA CHICAGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCHENRY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS FUND ↗
  • Who funds Center for Native Futures ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rik and Peg Master Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rik and Peg Master Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rik and Peg Master’s filings →

    More from the funding graph