Skip to content
RightSpace Storage Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

RightSpace Storage Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$154kFood & Nutrition$125kReligion$65kEducation$62kInternational$47kHuman Services$37kPhilanthropy$35kCivil Rights$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k38 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
$500
Median grant
17
States reached
$184k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Logos Wilderness Therapy$25,000
Symba Center$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
One ATTA Time$15,000
Cru$12,000
Biola University$10,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Foothill Unity Center Inc$2,700
Individual grant recipient$2,500
I5 Freedom Network$2,500
The Ark of San Juan$1,500
St Mary's Food Bank$1,450
His Closet His Pantry$1,350
Menifee Valley Community Cupboard$1,150
Alzheimer Association$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Project Night Night: $500 → 10%I5 Freedom Network: $3k → 11%Navian Hawaii: $300 → 9%Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy: $500 → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $500 → 14%Las Vegas Rescus Mission: $5k → 13%Shepherd's Pantry: $100 → 5%New Hampshire Food Bank: $2k → 7%Foster Village: $3k → 10%Youth On Their Own: $500 → 15%Pregnancy Resource Center: $500 → 11%Project 150: $10k → 13%The Innocence Project: $500 → 17%All Faiths Children's Advocacy Cent: $500 → 14%The LGBTQ Center of Southern Nevada: $100 → 13%Pregnancy Resource Center: $300 → 11%Pregnancy Resource Center: $100 → 11%Unidos South OC: $10k → 10%Unidos South OC: $3k → 10%Doves: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
DE
AZ
NM
TN
DC
HI
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 41 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
74

Total granted

$388k
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+16%

Still filing today

59%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Logos Healing Institute
    5× · 2020–2024 · $91k · revenue +193%
  • OA
    ONE ATTA TIME INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue +302%
  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +21%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
8
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
9
Nevada Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.

Animals
10
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
11
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Assistance Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Unidos South Oc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/76
Grantees still filing
54/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cru: $43,500 · OtherCruIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $19,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+82 more: $168,630 · Other+82 moreLogos Healing Institute: $91,263 · HealthLogos Healing Instit…SYMBA CENTER: $20,000 · HealthSYMBA CENTER+9 more: $4,900 · HealthBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $40,000 · EducationJUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL: $6,300 · Education+3 more: $1,750 · EducationONE ATTA TIME INC: $46,000 · International+2 more: $1,900 · InternationalMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $40,000 · ReligionRBC MINISTRIES: $3,560 · Religion+1 more: $300 · ReligionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $12,405 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $8,395 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE: $7,625 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $5,620 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $3,665 · Food & NutritionMENIFEE VALLEY COMMUNITY CUPBOARD: $3,540 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $1,450 · Food & NutritionUNIDOS South OC Inc: $13,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 150: $10,000 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER VILLAGE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesI-5 FREEDOM NETWORK: $2,500 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $1,500 · Human Services+11 more: $4,700 · Human Services
Other$311,330Health$116,163Education$48,050International$47,900Religion$43,860Food & Nutrition$42,700Human Services$39,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLogos Healing Institute: $91,263 over 5y, 18% of budgetONE ATTA TIME INC: $46,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSYMBA CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIDOS South OC Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $12,405 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 150: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $8,395 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $8,145 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $7,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL UNITY CENTER INC: $6,940 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $6,690 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL: $6,300 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $5,620 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWORKS: $5,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE RESTORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $3,665 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS NURSES ASSOCIATION: $3,620 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $3,560 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENIFEE VALLEY COMMUNITY CUPBOARD: $3,540 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTER VILLAGE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetI-5 FREEDOM NETWORK: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUPELO CHILDREN'S MANSION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORP: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER DBA PATHWAY HEALTH CLINIC: $900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Heroes Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANYON LAKE LITTLE LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOG ORPHANS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESOLVE Incorporated: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Logos Healing Institute ↗
  • Who funds ONE ATTA TIME INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SYMBA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOS South OC Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE RISING INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE RESTORATION ↗
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MENIFEE VALLEY COMMUNITY CUPBOARD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Higher Rock FoundationThe Gap FoundationCarmax FoundationAustin Community Foun…Sempra FoundationNetwork for GoodKaiser Foundation Hos…AbbVie FoundationSynchrony FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…American Express Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…
Higher Rock FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Higher Rock Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Sempra Foundation · Network for Good · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · AbbVie Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization RightSpace Storage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from RightSpace Storage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Bagly Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Marine Biological Laboratory: 20% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to RightSpace Storage Foundation?

Find your warmest path to RightSpace Storage Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on RightSpace Storage’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home