Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ridgeway Em-Charittuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$94kReligion$89kEducation$89kHousing & Shelter$78kInternational$74kCivil Rights$45kHealth$40kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
$2,125
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC$18,622
VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST FAMILY$16,198
NATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE$10,625
GENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTRIES OF$10,625
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC$10,625
FERRUM COLLEGE$10,625
CONCERN HOTLINE$2,125
HEALTHY FAMILIES OF THE NORTHERN$2,125
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$2,125
ADULT CARE CENTER OF THE NORTHERN$2,125
HENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC$2,125
C-CAP OF WINCHESTER$2,125
THE LAUREL CENTER$2,125
BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC$2,125
TIMBER RIDGE SCHOOL$2,125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $19k → 5%UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $6k → 5%HENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$581k · 33 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
4

Total granted

$581k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

30%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CONCERN HOTLINE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +44%
  • TL
    THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +47%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TK
    THE KIDS CLUB OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • TY
    THE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Ridge Health Center Inc

Community health center

—
2
Virginia Lutheran Homes Inc

Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.

—
3
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
4
Miller Home of Lynchburg Virginia
—
5
St John's - St Vincent's Home for Chil

St john's home for children is a leader in delivering innovative and therapeutic services, in collaboration with our community partners and resources, to promote healing and growth for our children and family prosperity and resilience.

—
6
Goodwin House Incorporated

The mission of goodwin house incorporated ("ghi") is to support, honor and uplift the lives of older adults and the people who care for them through a faith-based, nonprofit organization affiliated with the episcopal church.

Human Services
7
Shenandoah Valley Medical System I

To promote health and wellness within the community by providing a medical home to reduce barriers to care and ensure access to a full range of coordinated health care and wellness services.

Health
8
The Virginia Home

The Virginia Home provides compassionate and professional residential care to adult Virginians with irreversible physical disabilities, ensuring that their lifelong comfort and security will never be compromised, regardless of the ability…

Health
9
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
10
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
11
Bridgewater Village Inc

Retirement housing

Housing & Shelter
12
Logan-Mingo Area Mental Health Inc

To collectively strengthen integrated behavioral and primary healthcare system by providing a continuum of services to the community that is responsive, accessible, and high-quality.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Youth Development Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ferrum College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST FAMILY: $79,130 · OtherVIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST FAMILYBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSN: $49,362 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSNVA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $49,362 · OtherVA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INCNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS: $44,788 · OtherNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERSGENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTR: $39,362 · OtherGENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTRBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC: $24,195 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTICGENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTRIES OF: $18,622 · OtherCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $18,201 · OtherGENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTRIES: $15,573 · Other+20 more: $93,275 · Other+20 moreFERRUM COLLEGE: $73,557 · EducationFERRUM COLLEGEWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $15,076 · EducationWINCHESTER EDUCA…VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $24,195 · Human ServicesTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $11,001 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $9,801 · Human ServicesHENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC: $2,125 · Human ServicesNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $18,622 · Arts & CultureLEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,701 · HealthDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $3,458 · Health
Other$431,870Education$88,633Human Services$47,122Arts & Culture$18,622Health$10,159

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFERRUM COLLEGE: $73,557 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC: $24,195 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $18,622 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $18,201 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $15,076 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $11,001 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $10,201 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $9,801 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,701 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $3,458 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FERRUM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA UNITED METHODIST HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN HOTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Woodmark Foundation IncVA21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Woodmark Foundation Inc · John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee · United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · Andrew U Ferrari Foundation · The Monford D and Lucy L Custer Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ridgeway Em-Charittuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ridgeway Em-Charittuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ridgeway Em-Charittuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph