Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richman Brothers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$182kHealth$168kHuman Services$146kReligion$113kRecreation & Sports$67kYouth Development$56kFood & Nutrition$45kArts & Culture$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$6,529
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVANTAGE CLEVELAND TENNIS CLINICS$10,000
NORTH COAST HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL$10,000
SAINT VITUS ENDOWMENT TRUST$10,000
FOOD BANK OF GREATER CLEVELAND$10,000
ST MARTIN DE PORRES$10,000
FREE CLINIC OF GREATER CLEVELAND$10,000
PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS$10,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF NE OHIO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,842
SLOVENIAN MUSEUM AND ARCHIVES$8,000
Individual grant recipient$6,529
PAULETTE HOUSTON$6,529
Individual grant recipient$6,529
GLOBAL CLEVELAND$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GLOBAL CLEVELAND: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$785k · 29 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
10

Total granted

$785k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-13%

Still filing today

48%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Circle Health Services
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +109%
  • UC
    URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +0%
  • TL
    THE LYCEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VITUS ENDOWMENT TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MH
    MALACHI HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -13%
  • HP
    HANNA PERKINS CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers

Greater cleveland neighborhood centers association forges key partnerships with community based organizations to support educational programs and connect with residents and promote more

Community Improvement
2
Northeast Ohio Neighborhood Health Services Inc

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of northeast ohio residents by providing comprehensive and excellent health care services in a sensitive and caring environment.

—
3
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
4
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
5
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
6
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
7
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
8
Cleveland Public Market Corporation

Cleveland public market corporations mission is to preserve the city's public market tradition while making the local food system more accessible, equitable, and diverse.

Community Improvement
9
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

—
10
Urban League of Greater Cleveland

The mission of Urban League of Greater Cleveland, Inc., (the League) is a community-based organization focused on eliminating the racial, economic, and societal barriers that prevent Black Americans and other underrepresented/underserved…

—
11
Cleveland Christian Home Inc

The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.

Religion
12
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Slovenian Museum and Archives Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF NE OHIO: $56,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF NE OHIOCircle Health Services: $55,000 · OtherCircle Health ServicesST MARTIN DE PORRES: $50,000 · OtherST MARTIN DE PORRESFOOD BANK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $45,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF GREATER CLEVELANDURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOLSAINT VITUS ENDOWMENT TRUST: $31,000 · OtherSAINT VITUS ENDOWMENT TRUSTHOLY FAMILY CANCER HOME: $30,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CANCER HOMENORTH COAST HEALTH: $30,000 · OtherNORTH COAST HEALTHIndividual grant recipient: $29,306 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOSEPH HOUSE OF CLEVELAND INC: $23,000 · OtherCOLUMBUS CENTER FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ATTN ANTHONY HOUSTON: $20,082 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,082 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,262 · Other+18 more: $98,570 · Other+18 moreTHE LYCEUM: $40,000 · EducationTHE LYCEUMTHE TURN: $26,000 · EducationTHE TURNSaint Martin de Porres High School: $15,510 · EducationSaint Mart…PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $60,000 · PhilanthropyADVANTAGE CLEVELAND TENNIS AND EDUCATION INC: $36,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON: $21,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH COAST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthREPLAY FOR KIDS: $14,500 · HealthEASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF MAHONING TRUMBULL AND COLUMBIANA COUNTIES: $6,000 · HealthSlovenian Museum and Archives Inc: $33,000 · Arts & CultureLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $18,000 · ReligionGLOBAL CLEVELAND: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$546,302Education$81,510Philanthropy$60,000Recreation & Sports$57,000Health$50,500Arts & Culture$33,000Religion$18,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCircle Health Services: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LYCEUM: $40,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetADVANTAGE CLEVELAND TENNIS AND EDUCATION INC: $36,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSlovenian Museum and Archives Inc: $33,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetNORTH COAST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetTHE TURN: $26,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON: $21,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOLUMBUS CENTER FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ATTN ANTHONY HOUSTON: $20,082 over 6y, 69% of budgetLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Martin de Porres High School: $15,510 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREPLAY FOR KIDS: $14,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetEASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF MAHONING TRUMBULL AND COLUMBIANA COUNTIES: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL CLEVELAND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMALACHI HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN RESOURCES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Circle Health Services ↗
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE LYCEUM ↗
  • Who funds ADVANTAGE CLEVELAND TENNIS AND EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Slovenian Museum and Archives Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COAST HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COAST HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE TURN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS CENTER FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ATTN ANTHONY HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
  • Who funds REPLAY FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF MAHONING TRUMBULL AND COLUMBIANA COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds MALACHI HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN RESOURCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · Community West Foundation · The Cyrus Eaton Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The McGregor Foundation · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · The Abington Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richman Brothers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richman Brothers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richman Brothers Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richman Brothers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richman Brothers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph