· Private foundation
Richard S & Ann B Barshinger Family Fdn
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $98k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $221k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTHCARE FDN | $50,000 |
| AARONS ACRES | $30,000 |
| LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| VISIONCORPS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| YORK COUNTY CEREBRAL PALSY HOME | $20,000 |
| LANCASTER SCIENCE FACTORY | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES | $15,000 |
| YMCA OF THE ROSES | $10,500 |
| TENFOLD | $10,000 |
| KPETS - KEYSTONE PET ENHANCED | $10,000 |
| POWER PACKS PROJECT | $10,000 |
| PRIMA ARTS INC | $10,000 |
| CHRIST'S HOME FOR CHILDREN | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $227k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER6× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +1%
- AAAARON'S ACRES4× · 2019–2024 · $93k · revenue +38%
- UDUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- LCLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +26%
- LCLANCASTER COUNTY AGRICULTURE COUNCILone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -27%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LANCASTER COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.
We embolden extraordinary community by investing in people and ideas that will shape the future of lancaster county.
Enhance public safety and the quality of life in lancaster by engaging the community and advancing current crime prevention strategies.
To provide comprehensive, skillful, cost effective emergency and non- emergency health care services to the lancaster community while continuing to evolve with changing health care needs.
Lancaster early education center provides affordable, quality childcare services to local families, mostly minority, while they are employed, completing their education, or in a job training program. the center participates in the…
The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…
The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…
Provides managerial and financial support to its controlled organizations and is also responsible for undertaking activities designed to advance the general health of the community.
The mission is to facilitate the unfolding of each child's unique potential through an outstanding montessori education that enables a child to meet future challenges, and that encourages a love of learning, independent thinking, social…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
Lancaster preschool believes that the preschool is an extension of the home environment where children can learn new skills, interact with teachers and peers, and experience hands-on learning opportunities through developmentally…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Country Day School and the most unlike its peers is Keystone Human Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AARON'S ACRES ↗
- Who funds UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds VISIONCORPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POWER PACKS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S CONCERN INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SERVANTS INC ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY CEREBRAL PALSY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds TENFOLD ↗
- Who funds YORK DAY NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA HERITAGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PRIMA ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds PENNON ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF LANCASTER ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY AGRICULTURE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CLARE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MOM'S HOUSE INC OF LANCASTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · The Steinman Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · High Foundation · Ferree Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · York County Community Foundation · William and Jemima Brossman Charita Charitable Foundation · The Abigail L Longenecker Memorial Foundation · United Way of Lancaster County · Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard S & Ann B Barshinger Family Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.