Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard Nelson Ryan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$182kReligion$97kEnvironment$88kRecreation & Sports$68kYouth Development$66kHealth$60kInternational$47kHuman Services$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$8,750
Median grant
6
States reached
$164k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMU (SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY)$25,000
APDA AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOC$20,000
EDEN II GENESIS FOUNDATION$16,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$10,000
WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL$8,750
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$8,750
SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION$5,000
OSCAR STRONG FOUNDATION$5,000
LIFE WIRE$5,000
CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $3k → 9%LIFE WIRE: $8k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $800 → 9%LIFE WIRE: $6k → 9%DVCC DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 9%DVCC DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$559k · 16 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$559k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-11%

Still filing today

44%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +70%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +28%
  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BA
    BLAIR ACADEMY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • TJ
    THE JAMES C FERRER EDUCATIONAL FUNDINC (FORMERLY SHINNECOCK HILLS EDUCATIONAL )
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -19%
  • TJ
    THE JAMES B LEE JRSCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
5
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
6
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
9
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
10
The Salish Sea School

The salish sea schools mission is to awaken curiosity and deepen connections with the sea through shore and sea exploration programs for all ages.

Environment
11
Blue World Foundation Inc

To stabilize the population of marine species in danger, especially sharks and rays in the caribbean of guatemala; through science and community strengthening which will provide the creation of alternative livelihoods, which eventually…

Environment
12
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Red Sneakers for Oakley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROOKS SCHOOL: $88,800 · OtherBROOKS SCHOOLEDEN II AND GENESIS FOUNDATION: $58,000 · OtherEDEN II AND GENESIS FOUNDATIONSMU (SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY): $48,000 · OtherSMU (SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY)EDEN II GENESIS FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherEDEN II GENESIS FOUNDATIONAPDA AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSO: $30,127 · OtherAPDA AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOAPDA AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOC: $30,000 · OtherAPDA AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE ASSOCFRIENDS OF THE WATERFRONT: $28,391 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WATERFRONTBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA: $18,750 · OtherBLAIR ACADEMY SCHOOL: $14,000 · Other+10 more: $65,549 · Other+10 moreSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsSEATTLE PA…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILD…WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $46,750 · InternationalBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentLifeWire: $14,156 · Human ServicesFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE JAMES C FERRER EDUCATIONAL FUNDINC (FORMERLY SHINNECOCK HILLS EDUCATIONAL ): $11,500 · Philanthropy
Other$413,617Recreation & Sports$60,000Environment$60,000International$46,750Youth Development$30,000Human Services$20,956Philanthropy$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $46,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLifeWire: $14,156 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAMES C FERRER EDUCATIONAL FUNDINC (FORMERLY SHINNECOCK HILLS EDUCATIONAL ): $11,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds LifeWire ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES C FERRER EDUCATIONAL FUNDINC (FORMERLY SHINNECOCK HILLS EDUCATIONAL ) ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT ↗
  • Who funds RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard Nelson Ryan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard Nelson Ryan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center: 10% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard Nelson Ryan’s filings →

More from the funding graph