Skip to content
Richard M Connor Sr & Florence B Connor Memorial Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Richard M Connor Sr & Florence B Connor Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$231kEnvironment$8kHealth$6kPublic Benefit$2kCivil Rights$2kHousing & Shelter$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$600Arts & Culture$100
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$15,106
Median grant
1
States reached
$585k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSE$20,805
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE$15,106
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POI$3,969
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH$3,530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROOKS SCHOOL: $1k → 10%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-GREEN BAY: $8k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POI: $11k → 10%TREES FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STOUT: $8k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR: $9k → 11%LAIRD CENTER FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE: $15k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSE: $21k → 12%NICOLET COLLEGE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE: $6k → 13%LAONA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $9k → 14%MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%BROOKS SCHOOL: $1k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-GREEN BAY: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POI: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STOUT: $7k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR: $8k → 11%MCHS FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH: $6k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE: $13k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSE: $17k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE: $3k → 13%CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 14%BROOKS SCHOOL: $1k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POI: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STOUT: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR: $7k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE: $6k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSE: $6k → 12%CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 14%BROOKS SCHOOL: $1k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR: $7k → 11%LAIRD CENTER FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSE: $6k → 12%CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 14%LOG A LOAD FOR KIDS: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH: $3k → 11%LAIRD CENTER FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
MI
MA
OR
IA
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 22 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$233k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-8%

Still filing today

64%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +64%
  • CF
    CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $5k · revenue +97%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • LS
    LAONA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • NC
    NICOLET COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation

To support scientific research within the uw-madison community by providing financial support, actively managing assets, and moving innovations to the marketplace for a financial return and global impact.

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
9
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
12
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation, chartered by congress, engages americans in community-based and national programs that promote the health and public enjoyment of the 193-million acre national forest system, and accepts and administers…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Property and Environment Research Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSE: $50,088 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LACROSSEUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $45,079 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE: $41,828 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIREUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $31,618 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POI: $18,924 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POIUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-GREEN BAY: $12,411 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-GREEN BAYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE: $9,689 · OtherLAONA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8,544 · Other+8 more: $8,641 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationBROOKS SCHOOL: $4,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationCAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $1,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $400 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 · HealthTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentFOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC: $500 · EnvironmentTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $1,000 · Public BenefitPROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CENTER: $500 · Public BenefitMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Civil RightsAMERICAN STEWARDS OF LIBERTY INC: $600 · Civil Rights
Other$226,822Education$10,000Arts & Culture$5,100Health$2,600Environment$2,500Public Benefit$2,500Civil Rights$1,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $31,618 over 4y, 18% of budgetCAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN STEWARDS OF LIBERTY INC: $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CENTER: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRHINELANDER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWALLOWA RESOURCES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kress Foundati…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
George Kress Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kress Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard M Connor Sr & Florence B Connor Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard M Connor Sr & Florence B Connor Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Wallowa Resources Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard M Connor Sr & Florence B Connor Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home