· Private foundation
Richard M and Christina Cocek Anderson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| TEXAS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL FOUNDATI | $2,500 |
| KILGORE COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| HARRISON COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC | $1,250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| BOOGIE WOOGIE MARSHALL FESTIVAL | $1,000 |
| HARRISON COUNTY UNITED WAY | $1,000 |
| MARSHALL DEPOT INC | $1,000 |
| WILEY UNIVERISTY | $1,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG PINES | $750 |
| GREATER MARSHALL CHAMBER OF COMMERC | $550 |
| PANOLA COLLEGE | $550 |
| KARNACK ISD FOUNDATION | $531 |
| HARRISON COUNTY AGRI BUSINESS ASSN | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +0% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MDMarshall Depot Inc4× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +93%
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION INC3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +67%
- TKTHE KILGORE COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +0%
Funded once
- HCHARRISON COUNTY FIREFIGHTER' ASSNone grant, 2021 · $4k
- TETRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $4k
- LBLADY BIRD GARDENone grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preservation and education of history and historical items of interest for the citizens and visitors of sherman, tx.
It is the mission of the marshall hospital foundation to promote growth of gsmc-marshall through a broad-based program of funding and to support the hospitals mission to identify and provide exemplary healthcare in a safe and caring…
As facilitators and catalyst for sustained economic growth, the chamber of commerce of mission, tx will provide services, infromation and the leadership to ensure
To receive contributions by means of donations, gifts, and bequests and to expend such funds for the advancement of the literary, scientific, and other educational endeavors of Midwestern State University, a tax exempt institution of…
The wilson county historical society was formed by local historians to research and preserve the rich past of wilson county, texas.
The western texas college foundation serves western texas college by soliciting, receiving, and administering gifts and grants for student scholarships, educational and cultural activities, and campus facility improvement and development.
To promote tourism awareness in the city of denison, texas.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide support to Marshall University by receiving, investing and administering private resources.
To promote business in marshall and the surrounding communitites and to promote a quality of life to support strong business.
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
How this is measured
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Wiley College ↗
- Who funds Marshall Depot Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KILGORE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Michelson Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds Harrison County United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARRISON COUNTY AGRI-BUSINESS ASSOCIATIO ↗
- Who funds BOOGIE WOOGIE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Greater Marshall Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds MISSION MARSHALL INC ↗
- Who funds Marshall Education Foundation Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: H E and Ruby Pelz Tr 2 · American Electric Power Foundation · The Turney Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Richard M and Christina Cocek Anderson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard M and Christina Cocek Anderson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Richard M and Christina Cocek Anderson’s filings →