Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family Trust Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$225kEducation$201kHousing & Shelter$120kHuman Services$105kFood & Nutrition$41kCrime & Legal$30kReligion$25kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $205k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORMAN ALCOHOL INFORMATION CENTER DBA THE VIRTUE CENTER$40,000
CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$20,000
BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC$20,000
MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE$20,000
FOOD AND SHELTER INC$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$20,000
NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$15,000
BETHESDA$10,000
COMMUNITY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORMAN INC$10,000
UNITED WAY OF NORMAN$5,000
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $5k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $20k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $20k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $15k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $11k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $10k → 13%BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$759k · 20 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$759k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+209%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +67%
  • NP
    NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +44%
  • NA
    Norman Alcohol Information Center Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $55k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORMAN PARK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +209%
  • CA
    Community After School Program Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
2
Assistance League of Norman Inc

Assistance League of Norman is an all-volunteer nonprofit organization dedicated to transforming lives of children and families through our community programs.

Human Services
3
North Oklahoma County Mental Health Center

NorthCare offers a variety of services for children, adults, and families, designed to help you, your child, and your family recover from mental illness, substance use, trauma, or crisis to live a life in recovery.

Health
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
5
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Northeastern Oklahoma Council On Alcoholism

The organization is engaged in the service of rehabilitating users of alcohol and drugs. the center is also involved in community service programs, dui schools and out-patient counseling.

Health
7
Northern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc

To enhance the educational opportunities and environment at Northern Oklahoma College as set forth in the Foundation's articles and the mission statement of the college

Education
8
NorthCare General Pershing Inc

The corporation is organized to hold and manage real estate as part of the charitable purpose to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the charitable purposes of north oklahoma county mental health center d/b/a northcare, an…

Health
9
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
10
Cleveland County Economic Development Coalition

Improving the quality of life of norman residents through the creation and retention of jobs.

—
11
Children's House of Norman Inc

Childrens House varied Curriculm follws the Montessori method. Principle areas of learning include Practical Life Skills, Language Development, Math, Science, Geography, Art,French, Music,Cultural Studies and Farm School.

—
12
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norman Regional Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Norman Park Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORMAN ALCOHOL INFORMATION CENTER DBA THE VIRTUE CENTER: $60,000 · OtherNORMAN ALCOHOL INFORMATION CEN…ABOTT HOUSE: $30,000 · OtherABOTT HOUSECLEVELAND COUNTY YMCA: $20,000 · OtherCLEVELAND COUNTY YMCANORMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherNORMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUND…INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PRAYER: $15,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PRAYERUnited Way of Norman Inc: $14,500 · OtherUnited Way of Norman IncOU FOUNDATION - FOOD PANTRY: $13,000 · OtherOU FOUNDATION - FOOD PANTRYCOMMUNITY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherNORMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $18,000 · Other+4 moreBRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $86,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OF NORMAN INCCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FA…Norman Alcohol Information Center Inc: $55,000 · HealthNorman Alcohol Info…BETHESDA INC: $50,000 · HealthBETHESDA INCNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthNORMAN REGIONAL HEA…NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationNORMAN PUBLIC SC…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $44,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OK…FOOD AND SHELTER INC: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterFOOD AND SHE…MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $30,000 · Crime & LegalMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $28,000 · Food & NutritionTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$210,500Human Services$171,000Health$135,000Education$114,500Housing & Shelter$90,000Crime & Legal$30,000Food & Nutrition$28,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $90,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBRIDGES OF NORMAN INC: $86,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetNorman Alcohol Information Center Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBETHESDA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $44,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $28,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUnited Way of Norman Inc: $14,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORMAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD AND SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES OF NORMAN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Norman Alcohol Information Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Norman Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brinkley Family FoundationOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brinkley Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Norman Inc · Philip Boyle Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Oec Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Jimmie Lynn and Billye Austin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard L and Charlotte Reynolds Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph