· Private foundation
Richard K Lubin Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k65 grants · $195k
- $10k–50k46 grants · $730k
- $50k–250k34 grants · $3.0M
- $250k+9 grants · $7.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | $2,063,317 |
| MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS - BOSTON | $1,130,000 |
| UNITED WAY | $1,078,100 |
| WINSOR SCHOOL | $1,070,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $620,000 |
| BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $412,500 |
| BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT | $300,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY | $275,000 |
| BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER | $251,000 |
| CHILDRENS AID | $225,585 |
| NOW & THERE | $205,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON | $175,000 |
| PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION | $155,000 |
| BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $150,000 |
| SQUASHBUSTERS | $130,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
137 repeat relationships — 120 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $479k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $10M · revenue +73%
THE WINSOR SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +26%- BSBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +27%
Funded once
- HBHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $400k
- SRSRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +134%
- CTCHILD TRENDSone grant, 2022 · $82k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Bb&n, an all gender day school in cambridge, massachusetts, was established in 1974 by the merger of two independent schools, the buckingham school and the browne & nichols school, founded respectively in 1889 and 1883. located on multiple…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Somerset Club Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 213 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE WINSOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Cellobello Inc ↗
- Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON PUBLIC ART TRIENNIAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CELEBRITY SERIES OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds FROM THE TOP INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Barr Foundation · The Klarman Family Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Fidelity Foundation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard K Lubin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Hyde Square Task Force Inc — 52% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Children's Services of Roxbury Inc — 35% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- The Second Step Inc — 26% of income from government
- Reclaim Childhood Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Brookline Greenspace Alliance Inc — 19% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Rehearsal for Life Inc — 11% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boston Music Project Inc — 9% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- From the Top Inc — 6% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Emmanuel Music Inc — 5% of income from government
- Radius Ensemble Incorporated — 5% of income from government
- Musiconnects Inc — 5% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Boston Festival Orchestra Inc — 4% of income from government
- Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Celebrity Series of Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
- West End House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
- Boston's Higher Ground Inc — 2% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Community Music Center — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Conservatory of Music — 1% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- United Way of Palm Beach County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Beacon Academy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of the Public Garden Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- American Repertory Theatre Co Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.