Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard E Bennett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$88kReligion$62kHealth$33kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHousing & Shelter$1kHuman Services$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,900
Median grant
4
States reached
$427k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE - DAF$25,000
Individual grant recipient$6,250
STOKED MENTORING$5,000
LICADD$3,232
ST MARY'S$2,900
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$2,100
THE KENDALL MADISON FOUNDATION$1,120
BEAM$1,000
ARCHANGEL MICHAEL CHURCH$1,000
EAST HARLEM SCHOOL AT EXODUS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MISSION HOUSE: $690 → 14%MISSION HOUSE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CA
UT
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 16 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$179k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

38%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $53k · revenue +36%
  • ST
    ST THOMAS MORE PLAY GROUP INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +18%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • JT
    JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
10
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Manhasset Community Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STDAVIDS: $41,500 · OtherSTDAVIDSFIDELITY CHARITABLE - DAF: $25,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE - DAFST MARY'S: $19,025 · OtherST MARY'SBEAM: $15,064 · OtherBEAMWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $10,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICINEINTERNATIONAL BREAST CANCER NETWORK FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BREAST CANCER NETWORK FOUNDATIONST VINCENT DE PAUL: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,250 · OtherCORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $6,100 · Other+16 more: $25,219 · Other+16 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $52,984 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $13,100 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LEL…STOKED MENTORING INC: $5,000 · EducationSTOKED MENTORING INCST THOMAS MORE PLAY GROUP INC: $4,000 · Education+2 more: $2,620 · EducationMANHASSET COMMUNITY FUND INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $3,500 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ITALY: $7,500 · InternationalJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,500 · HealthPKD FREE BABIES ALLIANCE LTD F/K/A PKD Outreach Foundation Ltd: $1,000 · HealthMission House Inc: $1,190 · Human ServicesGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $512 · Food & Nutrition
Other$166,158Education$77,704Philanthropy$11,000International$7,500Arts & Culture$5,000Health$2,500Human Services$1,190Food & Nutrition$512

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $52,984 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $13,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ITALY: $7,500 over 4y, 20% of budgetMANHASSET COMMUNITY FUND INC: $7,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST THOMAS MORE PLAY GROUP INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSEPH HORVATH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMission House Inc: $1,190 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPKD FREE BABIES ALLIANCE LTD F/K/A PKD Outreach Foundation Ltd: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ITALY ↗
  • Who funds MANHASSET COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds STOKED MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST THOMAS MORE PLAY GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSEPH HORVATH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission House Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE KENDALL MADISON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PKD FREE BABIES ALLIANCE LTD F/K/A PKD Outreach Foundation Ltd ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard E Bennett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard E Bennett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard E Bennett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard E Bennett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard E Bennett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph