Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard Cohen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$72kReligion$39kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$12kEducation$7kHousing & Shelter$7kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$545
Median grant
6
States reached
$522k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$11,051
JAFCO$8,750
TEMPLE SHIR TIVKA$7,155
OUR CHANGE FOUNDATION$2,513
FIND THE CAUSE$2,450
TEMPLE SHALOM$1,116
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL$925
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$722
GANN ACADEMY$545
AFDMA$500
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$411
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$259
YMCA$250
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JCC GREATER BOSTON: $500 → 8%CATIE'S CLOSET INC: $3k → 16%CATIES CLOSET: $1k → 16%CATIE'S CLOSET INC: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 32 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
50

Total granted

$158k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+9%

Still filing today

59%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +76%
  • LF
    LAPPIN FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +238%
  • FT
    FIND THE CAUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • A
    ASPCA
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +67%
  • SF
    STEARNS FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Joslin Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to search for a cure.

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
11
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feinstein Health Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
34/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE SHIR TIKVA: $18,090 · OtherTEMPLE SHIR TIKVAJAFCO: $11,318 · OtherJAFCOJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $5,509 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INCASPCA: $3,500 · OtherGANN ACADEMY: $3,318 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,762 · Other+57 more: $34,451 · Other+57 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $47,089 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationFIND THE CAUSE INC: $7,180 · HealthFIND THE CAUSE INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,150 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $4,140 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc+7 more: $2,053 · HealthLAPPIN FOUNDATION: $19,523 · ReligionLAPPIN FOUND…ADAMAH INC: $1,238 · ReligionADAMAH INCCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $11,269 · PhilanthropyOUR CHANGE FOUNDATION: $2,513 · Philanthropy+3 more: $535 · PhilanthropyROSIE'S PLACE INC: $6,500 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterCatie's Closet Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON: $500 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $965 · Education
Other$78,948Health$65,612Religion$20,761Philanthropy$14,317Housing & Shelter$6,600Human Services$4,500Education$2,465

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $47,089 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAPPIN FOUNDATION: $19,523 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $11,269 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIND THE CAUSE INC: $7,180 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $5,509 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $4,140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCatie's Closet Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,762 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC: $2,425 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $1,786 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,262 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADAMAH INC: $1,238 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $965 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $879 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $711 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $565 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTPORT POLICE ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeinstein Health Fund Inc: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $355 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFALMOUTH ROAD RACE INC: $273 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILDRED'S DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $259 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHolliston Lions Club Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEACH KEEPERS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $232 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $156 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELRAY BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREYHOUND PETS OF AMERICA MASS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LAPPIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIND THE CAUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Catie's Closet Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADAMAH INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTPORT POLICE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Fiduciary Charitable Foundation Dba Fiduciary Trust Charitable · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard Cohen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard Cohen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Adamah Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Catie's Closet Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard Cohen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph