Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$149kEducation$71kReligion$63kHuman Services$42kRecreation & Sports$21kCommunity Improvement$8kHousing & Shelter$2kCrime & Legal$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$2,530
Median grant
2
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
One Child Center for Autism$13,000
Child Development Resources$10,800
Kumbo Development Orientation Centr$8,300
University of Notre Dame$2,530
Lackey Clinic$2,500
WM Catholic Ministry$1,300
MCV Foundation$1,000
St Margaret's House$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Lackey Clinic: $3k → 5%Lackey Clinic: $3k → 5%Lackey Clinic: $2k → 5%Lackey Clinic: $250 → 5%Lackey Clinic: $100 → 5%Hospice House: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$313k · 12 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$313k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTISM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +95%
  • CD
    Child Development Resources
    8× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +125%
  • DC
    DREAM CATCHERS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $34k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CC
    Cath Campus Ministry
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • HH
    HOSPICE HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +60%
  • MH
    MORRIS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Virginia Home

The Virginia Home provides compassionate and professional residential care to adult Virginians with irreversible physical disabilities, ensuring that their lifelong comfort and security will never be compromised, regardless of the ability…

Health
2
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
3
St Vincent's Home

The mission of st. vincent's home is to meet the needs of individuals with unique learning challenges across the lifespan. this includes supporting the family. the programs associated with st. vincent's home including the blue ridge autism…

—
4
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
5
Virginia Lutheran Homes Inc

Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.

—
6
Virginia Institute of Autism Inc

The virginia institute of autism is dedicated to helping people overcome the challenges of autism through innovative, evidence-based programs in education, outreach and adult services.

Philanthropy
7
Virginia Mason Health System

Advance and support the healthcare and research missions of virginia mason medical center and benaroya research institute at virginia mason through governance oversight of both organizations.

Health
8
Williamsburg Montessori School

Education and daycare activities based on the educational philosophy of Dr. Maria Montessori.

Education
9
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
10
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
11
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
12
Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association

Collaborating with our members and stakeholders, vhha works to ensure the sustainability of virginia's health care system and improve the health of all virginians.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morris Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DREAM CATCHERS: $34,200 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSWM Catholic Ministry: $29,666 · OtherWM Catholic MinistrySt Bedes Church: $27,085 · OtherSt Bedes ChurchFirst Tee of VA Peninsula: $16,000 · OtherFirst Tee of VA PeninsulaIndividual grant recipient: $14,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,760 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKumbo Development Orientation Centr: $8,300 · OtherKumbo Development Orientation CentrCath Campus Ministry: $5,694 · Other+7 more: $4,530 · OtherChild Development Resources: $65,138 · EducationChild Development ResourcesMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $22,100 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATIONUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $21,105 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac+1 more: $3,000 · EducationONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTISM: $80,000 · HealthONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTI…OLIVET MEDICAL MINISTRY INC: $7,350 · Human ServicesHOSPICE HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PENINSULA AND GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $500 · Housing & ShelterSt Margarets House: $200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$150,985Education$111,343Health$80,000Human Services$12,350Housing & Shelter$500Recreation & Sports$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTISM: $80,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetChild Development Resources: $65,138 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS: $34,200 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $22,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $21,105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET MEDICAL MINISTRY INC: $7,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWJCC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetVeritas Preparatory School: $2,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMORRIS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PENINSULA AND GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VIRGINIA TURFGRASS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
  • Who funds Child Development Resources ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CATCHERS ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds OLIVET MEDICAL MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WJCC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Veritas Preparatory School ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PENINSULA AND GREATER WILLIAMSBURG ↗
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA TURFGRASS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Margarets House ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Williamsburg Community TrustVA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Williamsburg Community Trust · Peninsula Community Foundation of Virginia Inc · Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard and Mary Ann Sleece Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard and Mary Ann Sleece’s filings →

    More from the funding graph