Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Richard a Barone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$330kEducation$197kInternational$85kAnimals$36kHealth$16kPhilanthropy$12kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF AMER PORCELAIN ART$70,000
BEST BUDDIES IN OHIO$25,000
GILMOUR ACADEMY$15,000
ST RAPHAEL SCHOOL$5,000
EDNA HOUSE$5,000
ARCH EAGLE FOUNDATION$2,000
MAGNIFICAT SCHOOL$800
PATRON OF THE ARTS$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%EDNA HOUSE: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$638k · 11 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +74% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$638k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+74%

Still filing today

18%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF AMER PORCELAIN ART
    5× · 2020–2024 · $323k
  • GA
    GILMOUR ACADEMY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $100k
  • HT
    Hands Together Inc
    3× · 2017–2022 · $85k · revenue -28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • DE
    DOMINIC'S ENDOWED FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Cleveland's Children
2
Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio
Health
3
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
4
Grace Hospital

To serve as a center for excellence in the provision of specialized health care services and comfort for patients and families coping with catastrophic illness and injury.

Health
5
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
6
Cleveland Christian Home Inc

The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.

Religion
7
Habitat for Humanity of Cleveland Inc

Habitat for humanity of cleveland is a non-profit christian housing ministry. habitat works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities for people in need by building and selling houses…

Housing & Shelter
8
Cleveland Avenue Foundation for Education
Human Services
9
L Arche Cleveland Inc

L'arche cleveland, inc. (l'arche) is a not for profit, incorporated, faith-based community/agency which provides homes and services to adults with developmental disabilities. individuals with and without developmental disabilities create…

10
The Christ Hospital Foundation

The mission of the christ hospital foundation ('tch fdn') is to support the mission of the christ hospital ('tch'). tch's mission is to improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the…

Health
11
The Cincinnati Woman's Club Foundation
12
Christian Children's Home of Ohio Inc

Provide care to hurting and troubled children and families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Arch Eagle Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSEUM OF AMER PORCELAIN ART — $322,500 · OtherMUSEUM OF AMER PORCELAIN ARTGILMOUR ACADEMY INC — $100,000 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INCBEST BUDDIES IN OHIO — $36,000 · OtherBEST BUDDIES IN OHIOCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · Other+15 more — $82,133 · Other+15 moreHands Together Inc — $85,000 · InternationalHands Togethe…CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS — $3,500 · EducationEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesINMOTION — $3,333 · HealthARCH EAGLE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyLAKE HUMANE SOCIETY — $300 · Animals
Other$570,633International$85,000Education$23,500Human Services$6,000Health$3,333Philanthropy$2,000Animals$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHands Together Inc — $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS — $3,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINMOTION — $3,333 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARCH EAGLE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE HUMANE SOCIETY — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hands Together Inc
  • Who funds CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND
  • Who funds HOUSE OF CHAMPIONS
  • Who funds INMOTION
  • Who funds ARCH EAGLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
  • Who funds LAKE HUMANE SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · Community West Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Richard a Barone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard a Barone Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard a Barone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph