Skip to content

· Private foundation

Returning Home Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$194k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$328kYouth Development$302kCrime & Legal$185kCivil Rights$110kPublic Benefit$61kHousing & Shelter$33kCommunity Improvement$29kFood & Nutrition$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Others Under 500 Each$28,193
ACLU Foundation of So CA$20,000
Orangewood Foundation$11,000
Charitable Ventures CO Hire$10,000
Prison Policy Initiative PPI$10,000
Laguna Beach Food Pantry$5,000
Office of Restorative Justice$5,000
CSPC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Family Safety Foundation: $10k → 16%Family Safety Foundation: $10k → 16%Wise Place: $25k → 10%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%Wise Place: $250 → 10%Project Kinship: $20k → 10%Project Kinship: $20k → 10%Project Kinship: $10k → 10%Project Kinship: $10k → 10%Project Kinship: $5k → 10%Project Kinship: $1k → 10%Project Kinship: $1k → 10%Project Kinship: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 98% of Returning Home Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 1%.

Returning Home Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 31 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
21

Total granted

$1.2M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+28%

Still filing today

35%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsHousing & ShelterEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $301k · revenue +13%
  • PK
    PROJECT KINSHIP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue ×59
  • W
    WISEPLACE
    2× · 2019–2021 · $25k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • OY
    Orangewood Yound Adult Court
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +65%
  • A
    ACSOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prison Law Office

The mission of the prison law office is to reduce incarceration and ensure humane and constitutional treatment of people who remain in prisons, jails and on parole.

Crime & Legal
2
Community Legal Aid Socal

To provide civil legal services to low-income individuals and to promote equal access to the justice system through advocacy, legal counseling, innovative self-help services, in depth legal representation, community education, and economic…

Crime & Legal
3
Aclu Foundation of Southern California

See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through litigation, policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil…

Civil Rights
4
Los Angeles Innocence Project Inc

The purpose is to exonerate the wrongly convicted, uncover and remedy past misuse of evidence in the courtroom, and improve the dialogue among stakeholders in the criminal legal system to prevent future injustice.

Crime & Legal
5
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
6
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
7
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
8
Fair Housing Foundation

The fair housing foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the elimination of discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
9
Court Appointed Special Advocate of Orange County

Court Appointed Special Advocates of Orange County provides a powerful voice and a meaningful connection for children who have experienced abuse, neglect and abandoment.

Civil Rights
10
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
11
American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California

See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil rights of all…

—
12
Friends Outside in Los Angeles County

Assist prisoners, ex-prisoners and their families with the immediate and long-termeffects of incarceration and provide services for successful re-entry.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sentencing Project; the most unlike its peers is Facts Education Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

People For Irvine Community Health: $136,524 · OtherPeople For Irvine Community HealthPrison Policy Initiative PPI: $132,000 · OtherPrison Policy Initiative PPIIndividual grant recipient: $120,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOthers Under 500 Each: $83,936 · OtherOthers Under 500 EachACLU Foundation of So CA: $60,000 · OtherACLU Foundation of So CACASA: $53,100 · OtherCASAOrangewood Yound Adult Court: $50,000 · OtherOrangewood Yound Adult Court+32 more: $253,048 · Other+32 moreORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $300,750 · Crime & LegalORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION+1 more: $250 · Crime & LegalPROJECT KINSHIP: $68,031 · Human ServicesPROJECT K…WISEPLACE: $25,250 · Human ServicesWISEPLACEFAMILY SAFETY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $11,050 · Civil RightsVoice of Orange CountyOrg: $16,758 · EducationFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC: $7,930 · Housing & ShelterFACTS EDUCATION FUND: $2,400 · Housing & ShelterCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $2,033 · Community ImprovementAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $1,000 · International
Other$888,908Crime & Legal$301,000Human Services$118,281Civil Rights$31,050Education$16,758Housing & Shelter$10,330Community Improvement$2,033International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $300,750 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPeople For Irvine Community Health: $136,524 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetPROJECT KINSHIP: $68,031 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetWISEPLACE: $25,250 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVoice of Orange CountyOrg: $16,758 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $11,050 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC: $7,930 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $2,033 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA FOOD PANTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFCL EDUCATION FUND: $750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds People For Irvine Community Health ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT KINSHIP ↗
  • Who funds WISEPLACE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Voice of Orange CountyOrg ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FACTS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Returning Home Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Returning Home Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Returning Home Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Returning Home Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Returning Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph