Skip to content

· Private foundation

Retel Foundation Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$20kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$14kHuman Services$10kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$4kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700
Median grant
3
States reached
$271k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Waconia GatherGrow Food Shelf$1,700
Waconia School District 110$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,300
Waconia School Dist Band Boosters$900
Waconia Sch Dis 110 Choir Boosters$850
Waconia Faith Lutheran Church$800
Waconia School District 110$800
Sharinga and Caring Hands$700
Feed My Starving Children$700
Waconia West Carver Rotary$700
Minnesot Teen Challenge$600
Hope Internatinal$600
Southern Valley Alliance$500
Waconia Faith Lutheraan Church$500
Mavarvian Care Center$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Sharing Caring Hands: $700 → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $700 → 11%Sharing and Caring Hands: $700 → 11%Sharinga and Caring Hands: $700 → 11%Sharing Caring Hands: $500 → 11%Sharing Caring Hands: $450 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Retel Foundation Charitable Tr’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 87%.

Retel Foundation Charitable Trlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 24 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against -55% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$63k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-55%

Still filing today

38%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WACONIA UNITED FOOD SHELF
    4× · 2019–2022 · $6k · revenue +71%
  • SA
    SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +22%
  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SD
    School District 110
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • SD
    Sch District 110 Scholarship Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • SD
    School District 110 Scholarship
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Winona Health Foundation

The mission of the Winona Health Foundation is to gather, steward, and distribute resources needed to support and advance the mission of Winona Health and its affiliates.

Health
4
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
5
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Moravian Care Ministries

In the spirit of christ's love, auburn homes and services enriches the lives of those we serve through (w)holistic care and ministry strengthened by community relationships.

Religion
7
Riverview Healthcare Association

We deliver a healthcare experience that consistently exceeds patients' expectations through exceptional people - our people are our foundation. we employ trusted, dedicated professionals who serve with compassion, empathy and respect.…

Health
8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
Hope Haven Inc

As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.

—
10
Ridgeview Clinics

To provide healthcare services to the community served by ridgeview medical center.

Health
11
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
12
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is School District No 110 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Waconia Faith Lutheran Church: $5,000 · OtherWaconia Faith Lutheran ChurchWACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARY: $4,850 · OtherWACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARYWaconia GatherGrow Food Shelf: $3,200 · OtherWaconia GatherGrow Food ShelfWaconia School District 110: $3,000 · OtherWaconia School District 110School District 110 Schlarship Fund: $3,000 · OtherSchool District 110 Schlarship FundIndividual grant recipient: $2,300 · OtherSOUTHERN VALLEY ALLIANCE: $2,300 · OtherMavarvian Care Center: $2,000 · Other+28 more: $26,650 · Other+28 moreFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $3,750 · InternationalFEED MY ST…HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3,350 · InternationalHOPE INTER…WACONIA UNITED FOOD SHELF: $6,400 · Food & NutritionWACONIA U…Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $2,750 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,750 · HealthSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $3,750 · Human ServicesRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $2,100 · PhilanthropySCHOOL DISTRICT NO 110 FOUNDATION: $800 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 · Religion
Other$52,300International$7,100Food & Nutrition$6,400Health$4,500Human Services$3,750Philanthropy$2,900Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWACONIA UNITED FOOD SHELF: $6,400 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARY: $4,850 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $2,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN VALLEY ALLIANCE: $2,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORAVIAN CARE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WACONIA UNITED FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds WACONIA WEST CARVER ROTARY ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VALLEY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 110 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MORAVIAN CARE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Retel Foundation Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Retel Foundation Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Retel Foundation Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph