Skip to content
Results Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Results Foundation

We partner with local organizations to build the foundation for strong communities.

$83k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$225kPhilanthropy$56kHuman Services$48kYouth Development$25kEducation$24kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$18kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $43,743, the rows itemized in this filing. The $82,843 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$489k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUILD WEALTH MN INC$10,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$7,500
ONE ROOF COMMUNITY HOUSING$7,500
URBAN HOMEWORKS INC$7,500
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$5,993
180 DEGREES INC$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 11 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$259k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Housing & ShelterEducationReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $58k · revenue +160%
  • OR
    ONE ROOF COMMUNITY HOUSING
    3× · 2021–2023 · $23k · revenue +57%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    3× · 2020–2023 · $23k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • RL
    REMAX LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +34%
  • SC
    SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Housing Services of Duluth One Roof Lending

To provide financing that will help people of lower income find, purchase, and fix their homes, for both single family homes as well as rental housing situations.

Community Improvement
2
Community Neighborhood Housing Services

Our mission is "empowering individuals and communities by helping people, buy, fix and keep their homes". to further this work, we provide homeownership education and advising as well as residential community lending programs to families…

Housing & Shelter
3
Minnesota Housing Partnership

Minnesota housing partnership (mhp) expands housing and community development opportunity by leading collaborative work to promote systems change and grow develoopment capacity.

—
4
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of So Cent Mn Inc

Help families build strength, stability, and self-reliance through shelter.

—
6
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
7
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
8
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
9
Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership

To partner with communities to develop places for people to call home so that people in southwest and south-central minnesota have access to dignified affordable housing, and thriving, inclusive and equitable communities.

Housing & Shelter
10
Batc Foundation

To work in partnership with others to provide safe, durable, affordable housing for minnesota's homeless, veterans and others in need. as the charitable arm of housing first minnesota, the foundation partners with local service providers…

Unclassified
11
First Homes Properties

To provide opportunities for low and moderate-income households in southeastern minnesota counties to secure housing that is decent and affordable.

Housing & Shelter
12
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Roof Community Housing; the most unlike its peers is Eagles Cancer Telethon Golf Tournament. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC: $58,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INCREMAX LLC: $50,000 · OtherREMAX LLC180 DEGREES INC: $15,250 · Other180 DEGREES INCTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · OtherTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITYUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $7,000 · OtherHOPEWELL MUSIC COOPERATIVE-NORTH: $8,000 · OtherMATTER: $5,600 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherHOUSING IN ACTION INC: $46,500 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING IN ACTION INCONE ROOF COMMUNITY HOUSING: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterONE ROOF COMMUNITY HOUSINGJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRAMEMMA NORTON SERVICES: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterEMMA NORTON SERVICESWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INCGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTO…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $5,993 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN C…Build Wealth MN Inc: $20,000 · EducationBuild Wealth…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…Bolder Options: $10,000 · EducationBolder Optio…KIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationKIDS IN NEED…EAGLES CANCER TELETHON GOLF TOURNAMENT: $2,500 · EducationAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $15,000 · ReligionOVERCOMERS INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP: $1,800 · ReligionCENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: $15,000 · Crime & LegalSENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$156,350Housing & Shelter$129,000Philanthropy$55,993Education$49,500Religion$16,800Crime & Legal$15,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MINNESOTA INC: $58,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING IN ACTION INC: $46,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetONE ROOF COMMUNITY HOUSING: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBuild Wealth MN Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMMA NORTON SERVICES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budget180 DEGREES INC: $15,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBolder Options: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $5,993 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATTER: $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES CANCER TELETHON GOLF TOURNAMENT: $2,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetCHESTER BOWL IMPROVEMENT CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOVERCOMERS INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis Found…Otto Bremer TrustMightycause Charitabl…Ch Robinson Worldwide…The Richard M Schulze…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Greater Twin Cities U…Pohlad Family Foundat…Thrivent Charitable I…Fastbreak FoundationThe Hubbard Broadcast…Target Foundation
The Minneapolis FoundationMN25.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Pohlad Family Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Fastbreak Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Target Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Results Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Results Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Results Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Results Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $99k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Results’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home