Skip to content

· Public charity

Residence XII Foundation

To provide assistance to women and their families to promote successful substance abuse recovery, and to promote the physical and mental health and well-being of women in recovery.

$386k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$590kHousing & Shelter$505kHuman Services$105kEducation$77k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OXFORD HOUSE INC$40,000
HOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER$40,000
EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS$40,000
HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION$40,000
THE HOFF FOUNDATION$40,000
WONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES$40,000
MARY'S PLACE$40,000
EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES$40,000
EDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$35,700
SEATTLE UNION GOSPLE HOPE PLACE WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S SHELTER$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%EDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $41k → 9%OXFORD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $40k → 9%HOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER: $40k → 9%OXFORD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $40k → 9%EDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $36k → 9%OXFORD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $40k → 9%HOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER: $40k → 9%OXFORD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $40k → 9%EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $40k → 9%OXFORD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $40k → 9%EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $40k → 9%OXFORD HOUSE INC: $40k → 8%EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $30k → 9%EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $40k → 9%WONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 9%EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $40k → 9%SEATTLE UNION GOSPLE HOPE PLACE WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $25k → 9%EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $40k → 9%EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$1.2M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +13%
  • OH
    Oxford House Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +93%
  • MP
    MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • WC
    WONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2025 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $40k · revenue +24%
  • SU
    SEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2025 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
2
Trc the Recovery Center

Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.

Health
3
Meta House Inc

Meta house ends the generational cycle of addiction by healing women and strengthening families.

—
4
Stout Street Foundation

Stout street foundation operated an in-patient treatment center providing counseling, room and board, supervision and job training to ex-substance abusers. the period of residency is up to 3 years. approximately 325 people participate…

Crime & Legal
5
Elmhurst Home Inc

Substance abuse-the organization provides rehabilitive substance abuse treatments for residents of the state of mi

Health
6
Colonial House Inc

Colonial house, inc. strives to be proactive in the treatment and recovery of those impacted by the destructive nature of substance use disorders.

Health
7
New Horizon Care Centers Inc

New Horizon Care Center is a non-profit treatment facility for inpatient and outpatient services, including: drugs, alcohol, and gambling. The organization's mission is to honor the dignity of all persons and provide tailored, nurturing…

Health
8
Elijah Family Homes

Elijah family homes fosters hope, dignity, and self-sufficiency through stable housing and support services for families seeking recovery.

Housing & Shelter
9
East House Corporation

To provide residential, rehabilitation and support services in the rochester, ny area to adults recovering from major mental illnesses, chemical dependency and other disabling conditions.

Health
10
Cochran Recovery Services Inc

Providing treatment for persons with substance use and mental health disorders.

Health
11
Eden Rehabilitation Suites and Greenhouse Homes Inc

Eden rehabilitation suites and greenhouse homes. inc. is part of a family of healthcare and residential service organizations providing quality care and life enriching opportunities to the aging and those in need in a caring, christian…

—
12
Hazelden New York

Harnessing science, love and the wisdom of lived experience, we are a force of healing and hope for individuals, families and communities affected by substance use and mental health conditions.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evergreen Recovery Centers; the most unlike its peers is Oxford House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $240,000 · HealthEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERSEVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $230,000 · HealthEVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICESHOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER: $80,000 · HealthHOLMAN RECOVERY CENTERHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATIONMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $240,000 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLETHE HOFF FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOFF FOUNDATIONOxford House Inc: $240,000 · OtherOxford House IncSEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $25,000 · OtherSEATTLES UNION GOSPEL M…EDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $76,500 · EducationWONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $40,000 · Youth Development
Health$590,000Human Services$305,000Other$265,000Education$76,500Youth Development$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS: $240,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOxford House Inc: $240,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $240,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES: $230,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER: $80,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $76,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HOFF FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetWONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Residence XII Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Residence XII Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Oxford House Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Residence XII Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Residence XII Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Residence XII’s filings →

More from the funding graph