· Public charity
Residence XII Foundation
To provide assistance to women and their families to promote successful substance abuse recovery, and to promote the physical and mental health and well-being of women in recovery.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OXFORD HOUSE INC | $40,000 |
| THE HOFF FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| HOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER | $40,000 |
| WONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES | $40,000 |
| MARY'S PLACE | $40,000 |
| EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES | $40,000 |
| EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS | $40,000 |
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| EDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $35,700 |
| SEATTLE UNION GOSPLE HOPE PLACE WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S SHELTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EREVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +13%
- OHOxford House Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +93%
- MPMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- WCWONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICESone grant, 2025 · $40k · revenue 0%
HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2025 · $40k · revenue +24%- SUSEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSIONone grant, 2025 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.
Meta house ends the generational cycle of addiction by healing women and strengthening families.
Stout street foundation operated an in-patient treatment center providing counseling, room and board, supervision and job training to ex-substance abusers. the period of residency is up to 3 years. approximately 325 people participate…
Substance abuse-the organization provides rehabilitive substance abuse treatments for residents of the state of mi
Colonial house, inc. strives to be proactive in the treatment and recovery of those impacted by the destructive nature of substance use disorders.
New Horizon Care Center is a non-profit treatment facility for inpatient and outpatient services, including: drugs, alcohol, and gambling. The organization's mission is to honor the dignity of all persons and provide tailored, nurturing…
Elijah family homes fosters hope, dignity, and self-sufficiency through stable housing and support services for families seeking recovery.
To provide residential, rehabilitation and support services in the rochester, ny area to adults recovering from major mental illnesses, chemical dependency and other disabling conditions.
Providing treatment for persons with substance use and mental health disorders.
Eden rehabilitation suites and greenhouse homes. inc. is part of a family of healthcare and residential service organizations providing quality care and life enriching opportunities to the aging and those in need in a caring, christian…
Harnessing science, love and the wisdom of lived experience, we are a force of healing and hope for individuals, families and communities affected by substance use and mental health conditions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evergreen Recovery Centers and the most unlike its peers is Oxford House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EVERGREEN RECOVERY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Oxford House Inc ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN TREATMENT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HOLMAN RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds EDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOFF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Residence XII Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Residence XII Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Residence XII Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.