· Private foundation
Rentpath Gives Back Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $143k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Entryway | $25,000 |
| Atlanta Children's Shelter | $25,000 |
| Toys for Tots | $13,150 |
| HOPE Atlanta | $10,000 |
| Portland Rescue Mission | $10,000 |
| Central Arizona Shelter Services | $10,000 |
| Atlanta Mission | $10,000 |
| The Bridge Homeless Recovery Center | $10,000 |
| Los Angeles Mission Inc | $10,000 |
| Metropolitan Ministries | $10,000 |
| Raleigh Rescue Mission | $10,000 |
| Atlanta Community Food Bank | $7,500 |
| Atlanta Habitat for Humanity | $6,000 |
| Hope Atlanta | $1,781 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHOPE ATLANTA INC3× · 2020–2023 · $14k · revenue +121%
- ACATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC2× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +50%
- NHNicholas House Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- ODOpen Doors Solutions Incone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -33%
- HHHATCHING HOPEone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +11%
- VEVETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIAone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.
The mission of Intown Cares is to prevent and reverse homelessness and hunger in Intown Atlanta. We envision a thriving community equipped to provide prompt and effective support for those experiencing homelessness and hunger. Our work is…
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
Providing transitional and permanent supportive housing, along with homelessness prevention policies, to individuals who are experiencing or at immediate risk of experiencing homelessness (including veterans and hospital to home from grady…
To investigate and then raise public awareness about the many problems that are facing families and individuals who are at risk of slipping into poverty or who are living in poverty, and then to mobilize financial resources, products, and…
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
To develop, finance, and advocate for affordable housing at scale that promotes racial equity and healthy communities where families thrive.
To coordinate a comprehensive response system to ending homelessness in the city of atlanta.
Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.
The food bank operates as a clearing house for the collecting, sorting, storing and distribution of edible food to qualified agencies; who in turn pass the food along to alabama's "food insecure" citizens.
The coalition for the homeless is the nation's oldest advocacy and direct service organization helping homeless individuals and families. we believe that affordable housing, sufficient food and the chance to work for a living wage are…
In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Poor Roberts Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Open Doors Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds HATCHING HOPE ↗
- Who funds ENTRYWAY ↗
- Who funds VETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds HOPE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE STEPS ↗
- Who funds THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Nicholas House Inc ↗
- Who funds MOVE FOR HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds MY SISTERS' PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds STAR C CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds REFLECTIONS OF TRINITY INC ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE APARTMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS ↗
- Who funds FEEDING LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Bennett Thrasher Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rentpath Gives Back Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware Center for Homeless Veterans Inc — 100% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- My Sisters' Place Inc — 26% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Homeplate Youth Services — 17% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.