Skip to content
Rennoc Corporation Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rennoc Corporation Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$304k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$239kAnimals$188kHuman Services$159kHousing & Shelter$148kFood & Nutrition$125kInternational$125kYouth Development$111kCommunity Improvement$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Partners In Health$50,000
Bayshore Center at BiValve$50,000
Stoney Brook Foundation$22,500
Our Future First$20,000
Dressage at Devon$15,000
Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament$13,000
Riverfront Renaissance Center For the Arts$10,000
Odd Paws Rescue$10,000
Doctors Without Borders$7,500
People For Animals$7,000
Danielle Rose Ministries$7,000
Marine Mammal Stranding Center$7,000
Woodford Cedar Run Wildlife Refuge$6,500
Broadway Cares$5,000
Tyler Robinson Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pawsitive Perspectives Asst Dogs: $1k → 6%The Link: $5k → 11%Stoney Brook Foundation: $23k → 10%Stoney Brook Foundation: $15k → 10%Our Future First: $25k → 16%Stoney Brook Foundation: $10k → 10%Philadelphia Warriors Hockey Club: $2k → 22%Our Future First: $20k → 16%Broad Street Ministry: $5k → 22%Our Future First: $20k → 16%Our Future First: $20k → 16%Amigos de Jesus: $3k → 6%Amigos De Jesus: $2k → 6%Our Future First: $20k → 16%Amigos De Jesus: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 46 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
35

Total granted

$1.3M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+3%

Still filing today

65%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAYSHORE CENTER AT BIVALVE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $217k · revenue +11%
  • OF
    OUR FUTURE FIRST
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +51% · 40% of their budget
  • DA
    DRESSAGE AT DEVON
    5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • DO
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue +301%
  • HH
    HENDRICKS HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • TC
    THE CALTECH Y
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
2
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
3
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
4
The Humane Society of Delaware County

Adoptions of unwanted animals, sterilization of pets to prevent overpopulation.

Animals
5
Barnyard Sanctuary a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

Our mission is to rescue and advocate for farm animals who are displaced or abused, to provide them with a safe and loving home and to inspire a more compassionate future for humans, animals and the planet.

Animals
6
Friends of Camden Animal Shelter

To rescue and shelter abandoned and unwanted animals until they can be found permanent safe and caring homes.

Animals
7
Delaware Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Delaware spca is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty and the encouragement of humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
8
Home for Good Dog Rescue Inc

The mission of the organization is to rescue, nurture and adopt dogs of all breeds into loving homes for good.

Animals
9
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
10
Days End Farm Horse Rescue Inc

To ensure quality care and treatment of horses through intervention, education and outreach.

Animals
11
First State Animal Center and Spca Inc

Our mission is to prevent cruelty and suffering to animals, rescue the trapped or injured, provide emergency medical treatment and temporary housing to the homeless animals, and to reduce pet overpopulation through various spay/neuter and…

Animals
12
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Barn studio of Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
36/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salvation Army: $125,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyShirley Eves Center: $75,000 · OtherShirley Eves CenterPope Francis Food Pantry: $54,000 · OtherPope Francis Food PantryOur Lady of the Blessed Sacrament: $52,000 · OtherOur Lady of the Blessed SacramentThinkwell Institute: $47,500 · OtherThinkwell InstituteIndividual grant recipient: $30,500 · Other+62 more: $467,500 · Other+62 moreBAYSHORE CENTER AT BIVALVE INC: $216,700 · Arts & CultureBAYSHORE CENTER A…MINNESOTA CHORALE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRiverfront Renaissance Center for the Arts: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $11,500 · Arts & CultureOUR FUTURE FIRST: $105,000 · Human ServicesOUR FUTURE …STONEYBROOK FOUNDATION: $47,500 · Human ServicesSTONEYBROOK…+5 more: $18,000 · Human Services+5 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,500 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $40,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $5,000 · International+1 more: $1,500 · InternationalMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $39,000 · AnimalsNJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC: $13,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC: $11,000 · AnimalsSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc: $9,000 · AnimalsWOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $6,500 · AnimalsTAMERLAINE FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $6,500 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $6,000 · Animals+3 more: $6,000 · AnimalsPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 · HealthHENDRICKS HOUSE INC: $20,000 · HealthCUMBERLAND COUNTY GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $5,500 · HealthTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthDRESSAGE AT DEVON: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsINNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$851,500Arts & Culture$248,200Human Services$170,500International$99,000Animals$97,000Health$80,500Recreation & Sports$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYSHORE CENTER AT BIVALVE INC: $216,700 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetOUR FUTURE FIRST: $105,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetDRESSAGE AT DEVON: $60,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEYBROOK FOUNDATION: $47,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $39,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetTHE M25 INITIATIVE: $25,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM: $22,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHENDRICKS HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMillville Development Corp: $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE CALTECH Y: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetINNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HEART OF CAMDEN INC: $13,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC: $13,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetHOLLY CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA CHORALE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRiverfront Renaissance Center for the Arts: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSaint John's Hospice: $9,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $8,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $8,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTAMERLAINE FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWHYY INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DRESSAGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCUMBERLAND COUNTY GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos de Jesus: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LINK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH JERSEY DREAM CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYSHORE CENTER AT BIVALVE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR FUTURE FIRST ↗
  • Who funds DRESSAGE AT DEVON ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds STONEYBROOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Marine Mammal Stranding Center ↗
  • Who funds THE M25 INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds HENDRICKS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Millville Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds THE CALTECH Y ↗
  • Who funds INNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART OF CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLY CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds Ascent Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Riverfront Renaissance Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Salt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oceanfirst FoundationThe Gerald B Shreiber…Community Foundation …The Sykora Family Cha…United Way of Greater…Princeton Area Commun…Geraldine R Dodge Fou…Columbia Bank Foundat…The Robert Wood Johns…Citizens Charitable F…Chubb Charitable Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…
Oceanfirst FoundationNJ26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Sykora Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rennoc Corporation Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rennoc Corporation Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Heart of Camden Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Bayshore Center at Bivalve Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
  • Hendricks House Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc: 2% of income from government
  • People for Animals Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rennoc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home