· Private foundation
Rennoc Corporation Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Partners In Health | $50,000 |
| Bayshore Center at BiValve | $50,000 |
| Stoney Brook Foundation | $22,500 |
| Our Future First | $20,000 |
| Dressage at Devon | $15,000 |
| Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament | $13,000 |
| Riverfront Renaissance Center For the Arts | $10,000 |
| Odd Paws Rescue | $10,000 |
| Doctors Without Borders | $7,500 |
| People For Animals | $7,000 |
| Marine Mammal Stranding Center | $7,000 |
| Danielle Rose Ministries | $7,000 |
| Woodford Cedar Run Wildlife Refuge | $6,500 |
| Wheaton Arts & Cultural Center | $5,000 |
| Barn Studio of Art | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BAYSHORE CENTER AT BIVALVE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $217k · revenue +11%- OFOUR FUTURE FIRST5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +51% · 40% of their budget
- DADRESSAGE AT DEVON5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- DODISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAMgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue +301%
- HHHENDRICKS HOUSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +34%
- TCTHE CALTECH Yone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…
Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
Adoptions of unwanted animals, sterilization of pets to prevent overpopulation.
Our mission is to rescue and advocate for farm animals who are displaced or abused, to provide them with a safe and loving home and to inspire a more compassionate future for humans, animals and the planet.
To rescue and shelter abandoned and unwanted animals until they can be found permanent safe and caring homes.
Delaware spca is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty and the encouragement of humane treatment of all animals.
The mission of the organization is to rescue, nurture and adopt dogs of all breeds into loving homes for good.
Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.
To ensure quality care and treatment of horses through intervention, education and outreach.
Our mission is to prevent cruelty and suffering to animals, rescue the trapped or injured, provide emergency medical treatment and temporary housing to the homeless animals, and to reduce pet overpopulation through various spay/neuter and…
THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Barn studio of Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAYSHORE CENTER AT BIVALVE INC ↗
- Who funds OUR FUTURE FIRST ↗
- Who funds DRESSAGE AT DEVON ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds STONEYBROOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds Marine Mammal Stranding Center ↗
- Who funds THE M25 INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Millville Development Corp ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY TENNIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HENDRICKS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CALTECH Y ↗
- Who funds THE HEART OF CAMDEN INC ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds HOLLY CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds Riverfront Renaissance Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds Ascent Foundation ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA CHORALE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Sykora Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rennoc Corporation Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Heart of Camden Inc — 41% of income from government
- Bayshore Center at Bivalve Inc — 23% of income from government
- Marine Mammal Stranding Center — 10% of income from government
- Hendricks House Inc — 5% of income from government
- Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc — 2% of income from government
- People for Animals Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wheaton Arts & Cultural Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.