Skip to content

· Private foundation

Renee B Fisher Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$680k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of Renee B Fisher Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Silicon Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Renee B Fisher Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
12
’18
6
’19
8
’20
7
’21
6
’22
5
’23
3
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$8.6MArts & Culture$663kEnvironment$320kCivil Rights$249kEducation$240kInternational$46kSocial Science$45kPublic Benefit$24kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
  • $250k+2 grants · $960k
$20,697
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF G$680,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$280,000
NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL$84,787
FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION$25,000
PEQUOT LIBRARY$20,697
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$15,000
FRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRA$15,000
MEDIA UPPER PROVIENCE LIBRARY$12,750
FRIENDS OF JV FLETCHER LIBRARY$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN IN NEED: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
SC
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 19 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$5.6M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+50%

Still filing today

58%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HELENA GROUP FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $320k · revenue +10%
  • NM
    NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $272k · revenue +38%
  • FM
    FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $249k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CONCORDIA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • QF
    QUARRY FARM LEGACY PRESERVATION CAM
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH JACOB
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Long Beach Public Library

Advocacy for a strong library system in Long Beach

—
2
New Haven Free Public Library Foundation Incorporated

To work collaboratively with the New Haven Free Public Library to raise funds to support major initiatives and innovative projects that enhance the services of the Library to the residents of New Haven.

Education
3
Portland Public Library

Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…

Education
4
Friends of the Sacramento Public Library

We are a volunteer, community-based organization that advocates for the sacramento public library and helps raise funds for its collection, services, and facilities.

Education
5
Berkeley Public Library Foundation

The Berkeley Public Library Foundation (BPLF) amplifies the public investment to make a great public library extraordinary. To that end, we provide vital funds and ongoing advocacy to advance the Library's mission, vision, and strategic…

Philanthropy
6
Friends of the Jewish Community Library

The Friends of the Jewish Community Library supports the activities of the Jewish Community Library.

Education
7
Friends of the Narragansett Library

To support library efforts, maintaining an association of persons interested in the library,promoting increased knowledge and understandingog library functions, resources, and services, stimulating increased financial support, and…

Human Services
8
Friends of the Goleta Valley Librar

Provide financial support to the Goleta Valley Library Goleta CA.

—
9
Falmouth Memorial Library Association

To enhance the quality of life of our community by inspiring lifelong learning, providing free and open access to information, and fostering community connections.

Education
10
Friends of the Saratoga Libraries

Maintain high levels of library services, fund grants for library materials, furniture and personnel support, Inform community of library resources and services, provide medium for gift giving and volunteer opportunities to Saratoga…

—
11
Friends of the Hilton Head Library

The Friends of the Hilton Head Library was organized as a non-profit organization to promote literacy and encourage the pursuit of life long learning through use of the library's resources. We raise funds to help our library be the…

—
12
The Mercantile Library

A general library organized and operated for literary purposes. The members of the association seek to make a difference through literature and ideas, advancing interest in the written word, and celebrating the best in literary achievement.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Library of Hawaii; the most unlike its peers is Connecticut Science Fair Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF G: $4,095,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $248,500 · Other+20 more: $360,878 · Other+20 moreSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $4,445,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationPEQUOT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $231,020 · EducationMEDIA UPPER PROVIDENCE FREE LIBRARY: $65,250 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $42,350 · EducationLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $16,600 · Education+2 more: $15,000 · EducationHELENA GROUP FOUNDATION: $320,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $272,410 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $46,000 · InternationalWOMEN IN NEED INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$4,704,378Philanthropy$4,445,000Education$370,220Community Improvement$320,000Arts & Culture$277,410International$46,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $4,445,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHELENA GROUP FOUNDATION: $320,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $272,410 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $248,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPEQUOT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $231,020 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetThe Friends of the Bancroft Library: $75,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetMEDIA UPPER PROVIDENCE FREE LIBRARY: $65,250 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $46,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Library of Hawaii: $43,910 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $42,350 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $16,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYALEWOMEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE JV FLETCHER LIBRARY INC: $4,596 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PORT ANGELES LIBRARY: $3,125 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CATTICUS CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT SCIENCE FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HELENA GROUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEQUOT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Friends of the Bancroft Library ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA UPPER PROVIDENCE FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Library of Hawaii ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds YALEWOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE JV FLETCHER LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PORT ANGELES LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE CATTICUS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT SCIENCE FAIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Renee B Fisher Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Renee B Fisher Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Neighborhood Music School Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Pequot Library Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Renee B Fisher’s filings →

More from the funding graph