Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reitman Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Health$3.3MHuman Services$156kEmployment$70kHousing & Shelter$70kCivil Rights$55kCrime & Legal$15kEducation$14kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.2M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE REITMAN FOUNDATION - DONOR ADVISED FUND$3,212,885
COMMUNITIES IN COOPERATION INC$63,500
KESSLER FOUNDATION$25,000
SOUTH WARD CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
YEAR UP$20,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$20,000
BRIDGES OUTREACH$20,000
SCHOOLS THAT CAN$10,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES OF METROWEST$10,000
WEST ORANGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITIES IN COOPERATION INC: $64k → 10%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $25k → 4%COMMUNITIES IN COOPERATION INC: $40k → 10%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $25k → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $25k → 4%JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES OF METROWEST: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 8 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$483k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-36%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    Communities in Cooperation Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $104k · revenue +85%
  • KF
    Kessler Foundation Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $75k · revenue +13%
  • BO
    BRIDGES OUTREACH INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $70k · revenue +291%

Funded once

  • PARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -36%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NJ
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
3
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
4
Towards Employment Inc

We champion the potential of every person to succeed in a rewarding career, while working to create an equitable and inclusive workforce for tomorrow. we do this by providing skill development for in demand jobs, comprehensive supports,…

Employment
5
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
6
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
7
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
8
Employment Connection

Employment connection is a nonprofit st. louis community asset whose mission is "to assist individuals with limited opportunities to self sufficiency" including those recovering from substance abuse, the homeless, low-income individuals…

—
9
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
10
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
11
Streetwise Partners Inc

Streetwise partners' goal is to advance career mobility through mentorship, career coaching, and social capital development, helping unemployed and underemployed adults from overlooked communities achieve lasting financial stability…

Employment
12
Careerwise New York Inc

Careerwise new york's mission is to forge pathways to meaningful careers through bold advocacy, innovative apprenticeships, and industry led partnerships, creating a dynamic talent ecosystem that connects ambition to opportunity for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Ward Alliance; the most unlike its peers is West Orange Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE REITMAN FOUNDATION - DONOR ADVISED FUND: $3,212,885 · OtherTHE REITMAN FOUNDATION - DONOR ADVISED FUND+4 more: $132,500 · OtherCommunities in Cooperation Inc: $103,500 · Human ServicesKessler Foundation Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE OF METROWEST INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesYEAR UP INC: $60,000 · EducationSchools That Can: $10,000 · EducationSOUTH WARD ALLIANCE: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentPARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,345,385Human Services$258,500Education$70,000Youth Development$45,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunities in Cooperation Inc: $103,500 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetKessler Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $70,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH WARD ALLIANCE: $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE OF METROWEST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSchools That Can: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST ORANGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $4,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · George a Ohl Jr Trust · Pseg Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reitman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reitman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Partners for Women and Justice Inc: 83% of income from government
  • South Ward Alliance: 78% of income from government
  • Communities in Cooperation Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Kessler Foundation Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Bridges Outreach Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reitman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Reitman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reitman’s filings →

More from the funding graph