Skip to content

· Public charity

Region a Partnership for Children

To improve the quality of life for young children and families in western north carolina by encouraging advoccy, collaboration and funding services that focus on prevention and early intervention.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$388k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$27MHuman Services$1.2MHealth$377kCommunity Improvement$354kCrime & Legal$100kPublic Benefit$16k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $2,994,009, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,349,097 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $355,088 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.7M
$223,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAYWOOD COUNTY SCHOOLS$388,368
CHEROKEE COUNTY SCHOOL$356,624
SWAIN COUNTY SCHOOLS$341,744
JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOLS$335,792
MACON COUNTY SCHOOLS$285,696
CHEROKEE CENTRAL SCHOOLS$228,160
GRAHAM COUNTY SCHOOLS$223,200
CLAY COUNTY SCHOOLS$222,208
MACON PROGRAM FOR PROGRESS$194,880
HAYWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$117,197
LONG'S CHAPEL CHILD ENRICHMENT CENT$116,478
MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC$80,640
SOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMM$69,153
SWAIN COUNTY SCHOOLS$33,869
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Jackson County Department of Public Health: $144k → 18%Jackson County Department of Public Health: $123k → 18%Jackson County Department of Public Health: $123k → 18%JACKSON CO DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $117k → 12%Jackson County Department of Public Health: $117k → 18%JACKSON CO DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $110k → 12%KIDS ADVOCACY RESOURCE EFFORT INC: $100k → 12%Jackson County Department of Public Health: $112k → 18%Kids Advocacy Resource Effort Inc: $86k → 12%Jackson County Department of Public Health: $65k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 19 repeat orgs$578k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$29M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+28%

Still filing today

21%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $473k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MACON PROGRAM FOR PROGRESS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +38%
  • MP
    MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +90%
  • KI
    KARE Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +255% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • FR
    FONTANA REGIONAL LIBRARY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $54k · revenue +28%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Haywood County Schools: $3,774,045 · OtherHaywood County SchoolsSwain County Schools: $3,399,205 · OtherSwain County SchoolsCherokee County Schools: $3,145,399 · OtherCherokee County SchoolsSOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $2,292,996 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INCCLAY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $2,291,009 · OtherCLAY COUNTY SCHOOLSJackson County Schools: $2,148,020 · OtherJackson County SchoolsMacon County Schools: $1,761,602 · OtherMacon County SchoolsGraham County Schools: $1,704,143 · OtherGraham County SchoolsCHEROKEE BOYS CLUB INC: $1,614,460 · OtherCHEROKEE BOYS CLUB INCMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC: $1,418,158 · OtherMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INCHaywood Community College: $1,059,546 · Other+9 more: $1,325,714 · OtherMACON PROGRAM FOR PROGRESS INC: $2,382,928 · Community ImprovementMACON PRO…KARE Inc: $1,095,674 · Human ServicesFONTANA REGIONAL LIBRARY INC: $54,408 · Education
Other$25,934,297Community Improvement$2,382,928Human Services$1,095,674Education$54,408

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMACON PROGRAM FOR PROGRESS INC: $2,382,928 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $2,292,996 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC: $1,418,158 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetKARE Inc: $1,095,674 over 8y, 59% of budgetFONTANA REGIONAL LIBRARY INC: $54,408 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MACON PROGRAM FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds KARE Inc ↗
  • Who funds FONTANA REGIONAL LIBRARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Western North Carolina Regional · Dogwood Health Trust · North Carolina Community Foundation · North Carolina High School Athletic Association Inc · Manna Food Bank Inc · Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc · Nantahala Health Foundation · Nchsaa Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Great Smokies Health Foundation · NRA Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Region a Partnership for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Region a Partnership for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Region a Partnership for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph