Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Regals Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 17
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$147
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Regals Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$30k0%
FY20242$25k0%
FY20236$71k33%
FY202210$223k10%
FY202115$913k53%
FY20208$158k25%
FY20198$167k50%
FY201817$191k65%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.0MPhilanthropy$70kInternational$21kEducation$17kFood & Nutrition$12kHealth$4kHuman Services$3kCivil Rights$2k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Bnos Menachem Inc$500,0001n/a
Chabad of Hyde Park$236,1506n/a
Educational Institute Oholei Torah of Brooklyn Inc$161,0005n/a
Chabad of the West Sixties Inc$77,0004n/a
Colel Chabad$43,0003n/a
Base Yisroel$40,7003n/a
Chabad Israel Center Inc$35,0001n/a
Ohr Menachem$25,3001n/a
International Bris Association$20,00029%
Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC$20,00021%
Show all 30 grantees
All grantees of Regals Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Bnos Menachem Inc$500,0001n/a
Chabad of Hyde Park$236,1506n/a
Educational Institute Oholei Torah of Brooklyn Inc$161,0005n/a
Chabad of the West Sixties Inc$77,0004n/a
Colel Chabad$43,0003n/a
Base Yisroel$40,7003n/a
Chabad Israel Center Inc$35,0001n/a
Ohr Menachem$25,3001n/a
International Bris Association$20,00029%
Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC$20,00021%
Machne Israel Inc$19,0001n/a
Chabad Lubavitch of the West Side Inc$18,6002n/a
Congregation Ben Melech Inc$18,6001n/a
Ezrat Israel Inc$12,7501n/a
Maimonides Educational Center$10,0001n/a
Chabad Relief Project Inc$10,0001n/a
American Friends of Otzar Hachessed$10,000118%
Congregation Hari$5,3001n/a
Beis Yisroel Adelene$5,0001n/a
Nefesh$3,8002n/a
Congregation Bnei Yechiel$3,6001n/a
Belev Echad Inc$2,50012%
Crown Heights Chevra Simchas Shabbos V'Yom Tov Inc$1,80010%
Chabad of the Valley Inc$1,8001n/a
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc$1,70530%
Ascent-Inner Dimensions of Jewish Lifestyle Inc$1,50010%
Women's International Zionist Organization$1,29510%
Congregation Beit Edmond$7001n/a
The Birch Wathen Lenox School$50010%
Daniella Moffson Foundation Inc$15010%

Plus 18 recipients with no EIN on record ($864k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Regals Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Bris Association: $20,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Otzar Hachessed: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBelev Echad Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCrown Heights Chevra Simchas Shabbos V'Yom Tov Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc: $1,705 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAscent-Inner Dimensions of Jewish Lifestyle Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWomen's International Zionist Organization: $1,295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Birch Wathen Lenox School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDaniella Moffson Foundation Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY25.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Fjc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Gutnick Foundation Inc · Keren Hachomesh Inc · Charidy Global Foundation · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Regals Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Regals Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Regals Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Regals Foundation

How much does Regals Foundation give?
Regals Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $30,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 17 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Regals Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (94%), Philanthropy (3%), International (1%).
Who are Regals Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Bnos Menachem Inc ($500k), Chabad of Hyde Park ($236k), Educational Institute Oholei Torah of Brooklyn Inc ($161k).
Does Regals Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Regals Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Regals Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Nash Charity Foundation Inc, The Ojc Fund.
Where is Regals Foundation based?
Regals Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Regals’ filings →

More from the funding graph