· Public charity
Charidy Global Foundation
CHARIDY GLOBAL FOUNDATION was formed for the charitable purpose of increasing the giving space through multiple different means and create educational and technological tools to enable and empower people to give more money to nonprofit organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $671,667 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,589,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,917,433 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k8 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $224k
- $250k+1 grant · $279k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRASSHOPPER LLC | $279,000 |
| GOSEPHARDIC INC | $173,579 |
| HALACHA EDUCATION CENTER | $50,196 |
| LIOR GROUP LLC | $34,460 |
| TSEDAKA CENTER INC | $29,517 |
| CHABAD RELIEF PROJECT | $15,899 |
| LEV CHABAD | $13,201 |
| CONGREGATION CHASDEI YITZCHOK | $12,752 |
| CHABAD YOUTH | $10,000 |
| BRIT YOSEF ITZCHAK OF AMERICA INC | $8,874 |
| EZRAT ISRAEL | $7,367 |
| KOLEL TORAH INC | $7,337 |
| CHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL INC | $6,748 |
| CHABAD CHAYIL | $6,183 |
| JEWISH EMERYVILLE | $5,973 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.5M on the FY2023 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $1.5M to organizations and $35k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE TO INDIGENTS
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GLGRASSHOPPER LLC2× · 2022–2023 · $314k
- GSGO SEPHARDIC INC2× · 2022–2023 · $197k
- KTKOLEL TORAH INC3× · 2021–2023 · $87k · revenue -44%
Funded once
- CICHABAD-LUBAVITCH INCone grant, 2021 · $39k
- TTTHE TORAH NUCLEUS OF CENTER REHAVIone grant, 2021 · $29k
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHABAD OFWEST QUEENS INCone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Religious Teaching
servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs
To further French Jewish Culture, help integration of American in France and French in USA concerning Jewish Culture
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kolel Torah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chabad of Downtown Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 29% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KOLEL TORAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds CHABAD RELIEF PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TSEDAKA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL ↗
- Who funds LEV CHABAD INC ↗
- Who funds Friendship Circle of Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds SOLOMON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHABAD YOUTH QUEENS INC ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Krinsky Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Regals Foundation · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · Kolel Torah Inc · Hager Foundation · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charidy Global Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.